1955
DOI: 10.1021/ja01626a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl Affinities of Vinyl Monomers. Part I. Styrene and Phenylated Ethylenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that a'certain amount of nuclear methylation, which may well give rise to the formation of methane by the removal of hydrogen from the addition complex by a methyl radical, does take place. This is, of course, in conflict with the conclusions reached by Levy, Steinberg and Szwarc (1954) and Levy and Szwarc (1955), and while it is true that the latter workers' experiments were conducted at considerably lower concentrations of acetyl peroxide, and in the presence of considerable quantities of /sooctane, and that the reactions may follow a different course under these conditions, it is nevertheless difficult to accept their results as completely accurate in a quantitative sense until detailed product-analyses of the reactions carried out under these conditions become available. The numerical values of the "methyl affinities" of simple aromatic and heterocyclic molecules measured in this way must, at the moment, therefore, be accepted with some reservation, although, in a qualitative sense, there is little reason to doubt that they present a substantially correct picture.…”
Section: (A) Relative Rates Of Reaction With Alky I Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results show that a'certain amount of nuclear methylation, which may well give rise to the formation of methane by the removal of hydrogen from the addition complex by a methyl radical, does take place. This is, of course, in conflict with the conclusions reached by Levy, Steinberg and Szwarc (1954) and Levy and Szwarc (1955), and while it is true that the latter workers' experiments were conducted at considerably lower concentrations of acetyl peroxide, and in the presence of considerable quantities of /sooctane, and that the reactions may follow a different course under these conditions, it is nevertheless difficult to accept their results as completely accurate in a quantitative sense until detailed product-analyses of the reactions carried out under these conditions become available. The numerical values of the "methyl affinities" of simple aromatic and heterocyclic molecules measured in this way must, at the moment, therefore, be accepted with some reservation, although, in a qualitative sense, there is little reason to doubt that they present a substantially correct picture.…”
Section: (A) Relative Rates Of Reaction With Alky I Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The methyl affinities of most of the simple benzene derivatives investigated appear roughly to parallel the relative rates of attack on the same compounds by phenyl radicals (Table 4-3). This correlation has been pointed Methyl affinity 1 11 2-5 2-2 ± 0-2 4-2 ± 0-2 3-6 ± 0-2 0-65 ± 015 12-2 ± 1-5 2-4 5-2 10 5 1-65* 11-7 12- Levy and; 2 Heilman, Rembaum and Szwarc (1957); 3 Buckley, . out by Hey and Williams (1955) and by Heilman, Rembaum and Szwarc (1957).…”
Section: (A) Relative Rates Of Reaction With Alky I Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been proposed (1 1, 12) for radical addition reactions to olefins addition of methyl radicals to olefins (14)(15)(16)(17)(18) correlate quite well with eq. 9 and fit the expression…”
Section: Chc(r)(cn)oo' > Ch3c(r)(oc(0)ch3)oo' > Ch3-' C(r) (C(o)ochmentioning
confidence: 71%