2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-474x(99)00028-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methyl bromide adsorption on activated carbon to control emissions from commodity fumigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fumigants gaseous are methyl bromide (MeBr) and phosphine. However, it has been found that methyl bromide is a risk to the Earth's ozone layer [10]. It also creates damage to the environment and dangerous for human's health as it may still remain in the rice even though the gaseous is applied limitedly.…”
Section: Chemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fumigants gaseous are methyl bromide (MeBr) and phosphine. However, it has been found that methyl bromide is a risk to the Earth's ozone layer [10]. It also creates damage to the environment and dangerous for human's health as it may still remain in the rice even though the gaseous is applied limitedly.…”
Section: Chemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experimental results showed that coconut shell carbon displays excellent adsorptivity for methyl bromide as compared to other carbons and other adsorbents (Leesch et al). 7 Commodity fumigations using 16.5 ppt (parts per thousand, volumetric) methyl bromide (64 g/m 3 or 4 lb/ 1000 ft 3 ) are typical. Following an industrial-scale fumigation, as the contaminated air is evacuated from the chamber and is replaced by fresh air, the chamber approximates a well-mixed vessel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methyl bromide readily adsorbs onto peat-, shell-, and coal-based carbons. 7 Adsorption of about 1 kg of methyl bromide per 10 kg of carbon can be achieved at methyl bromide concentrations in air encountered during commodity fumigations. Capital expenses for such processes are relatively small and include the costs of the original load of carbon, fans, and ductwork leading from the fumigation chamber to the container housing the carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A process recently developed in the USA uses activated carbon to capture MB followed by thermal destruction. The intention of developers has been to provide a supply and disposal service by transporting the MB-laden carbon to a central processing site where it would be reprocessed or destroyed (Knapp et al 1998, Leesch et al 2000. A small commercial unit is in operation at Dallas/Fort Worth airport capturing MB from quarantine operations (McAllister and Knapp 1999) and a larger unit is now operating at a commercial berry fruit exporter's site in Watsonville, California (Knapp (2001).…”
Section: Destruction Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%