2017
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and/or their metabolites are important contributors to the overall estrogenic activity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon–contaminated soils

Abstract: In the present study 42 polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) were investigated for their estrogenic potential using the VM7Luc4E2 transactivation assay. Relative potencies were determined for mass-balance analysis. In addition, compounds were tested in combination with the estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist ICI182,780 (ICI) and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist/CYP1A1 inhibitor α-naphthoflavone. Luciferase induction and CYP1A1-dependent ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity were measured to assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dimethylation of dibenzothiophene increased the potency of the parent compound. The derivatives of acridine, 9‐methylacridine and 9‐(10H)acridone, tested in the present study failed to induce AhR‐mediated response in the H4IIE‐ luc assay, which is consistent with results of a previous study, in which those compounds failed to induce ethoxyresorufin‐ O ‐deethylase activity in breast cancer cells (Lam et al ). However, the small concentrations tested in the present study might be a reason why those compounds were not able to activate the AhR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, the dimethylation of dibenzothiophene increased the potency of the parent compound. The derivatives of acridine, 9‐methylacridine and 9‐(10H)acridone, tested in the present study failed to induce AhR‐mediated response in the H4IIE‐ luc assay, which is consistent with results of a previous study, in which those compounds failed to induce ethoxyresorufin‐ O ‐deethylase activity in breast cancer cells (Lam et al ). However, the small concentrations tested in the present study might be a reason why those compounds were not able to activate the AhR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Supplementary data to this article can be found online at: Flupentixol 2709-56-0 27 37 78 114 < 30 51 91 197 Fluphenazine 5002-47-1 268 114 66 133 < 60 82 334 165 Propiconazole 1.9×10 -5 EC50 2,8, h PCB 7.0×10 -3 EC20 3,13, t Estrone 1.1×10 -1 ECIR1.5 3,10, a TDCPP w 0.33 IC20 3,12, r Pyrene 4.1×10 -6 EC25 1,5, b,c PCB 138 5.3×10 -3 EC20 3,13, s Formononetin 2.3×10 -4 EC50 3,11, m Verapamil hydrochloride 0.27 IC20 3,12, r Terbuthylazine 1.3×10 -5 EC50 2,8, h PCB 153 6.0×10 -3 EC20 3,13, s Genistein 2.0×10 -4 EC10 3,10, a PCB 180 6.0×10 -3 EC20 3,13, s Naringenin 2.2×10 -5 EC50 3,11, m Propiconazole 5.4×10 -3 EC10 3,13, a Terbuthylazine 1.6×10 -7 EC10 3,10, a Terbuthylazine 4.1×10 -3 EC10 3,13, s Triphenyl phosphate 1.4×10 -6 EC10 3,10, a Triphenyl phosphate 1.7×10 -2 EC10 3,13, a 1 rat-based cell line 5 H4EII-luc 9 Hepa1c1c7 13 HG5LN-hPXR a (Neale et al, 2017) e (current study) i (Kinani et al, 2010) m (Procházková et al, 2017) q (Lam et al, 2017) u (Escher et al, 2013) 2 mouse-based cell line 6 H4G1.1c2 10 MELN 14 AREc32 b (Larsson et al, 2012) f (Denison et al, 1998) j (Pillon et al, 2005) n r (US EPA ToxCast) v 3 human-based cell line 7 H4L1.1c4 11 HeLa9903 15 p53RE-bla c g (Takeuchi et al, 2008) k (Creusot et al, 2013) o s (Creusot et al, 2010) w Tris(1,3-Dichloro-2propyl)phosphate 4 DR-CALUX 8 Hepa1.12cR 12 MDA-kb2 d (Behnisch et al, 2003) h (Ghisari et al, 2015) l (Leusch et al, 2010) p (Ceger et al, 2015) t (Creusot, 2011) x Tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate…”
Section: Appendix a Supplementary Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Soil has received far less attention with bioanalytical tools (Xiao et al, 2006). The few studies available focus on soils in connection with the application of sewage sludge to agricultural soils (Liu et al, 2014) or soil of e-waste recycling sites (Shen et al, 2008) or other contaminated areas (Sidlova et al, 2009;Lam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%