2016
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups

Abstract: Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 distinct subgroups (ie, pediatric low-risk choroid plexus tumors [cluster 1], adult low-risk choroid plexus tumors [cluster 2], and pediatric high-risk choroid plexus tumors [cluster 3]) and may provide useful prognostic information in addition to histopathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three subclasses exist, “plexus tumor, subclass adult”, “plexus tumor, subclass pediatric A”, and “plexus tumor, subclass pediatric B” that broadly correspond to the three previously defined methylation clusters [50]. “Plexus tumor, subclass adult” predominantly contains adolescent and adult patients with choroid plexus papilloma and a fraction of approximately 15% of atypical plexus papilloma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three subclasses exist, “plexus tumor, subclass adult”, “plexus tumor, subclass pediatric A”, and “plexus tumor, subclass pediatric B” that broadly correspond to the three previously defined methylation clusters [50]. “Plexus tumor, subclass adult” predominantly contains adolescent and adult patients with choroid plexus papilloma and a fraction of approximately 15% of atypical plexus papilloma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster three (young age and supratentorial location) contained CP tumors with a higher risk of progression and high p53 overexpression; CP carcinomas were only presented in this cluster and comprised 62% of this cluster. The data clearly highlight the potential of molecular profiling and p53 status to provide additional layers of information to improve risk stratification in CP tumors, including CP carcinomas in particular …”
Section: Biology and Molecular Findingsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, Thomas et al. have described a series of 92 patients with CP tumors in whom genome‐wide methylation profiling and unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis led to the identification of three distinct molecular subgroups (clusters 1–3) . Cluster three (young age and supratentorial location) contained CP tumors with a higher risk of progression and high p53 overexpression; CP carcinomas were only presented in this cluster and comprised 62% of this cluster.…”
Section: Biology and Molecular Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-validation of the RF classifier resulted in an estimated error rate of 4.89% for raw and 4.28% for calibrated scores and an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.99, indicating a high discriminating power (Figure 2b, Extended Data Figure 5c). The vast majority of cross-validation misclassifications occurred within eight groups of histologically and biologically closely related tumour classes, distinction of which is currently without clinical impact (with the possible exception of choroid plexus tumours 13 ; Figure 2b). We therefore defined eight ‘methylation class families’ (MCF), for which calibrated scores are summed up to a single score.…”
Section: Classifier Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%