2011
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylation profiling of rectal cancer identifies novel markers of early-stage disease

Abstract: Locus-specific hypermethylation was more prevalent in early- than late-stage disease. Hypermethylation of two or more of a panel of five tumour suppressor genes was associated with localized disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study revealed that methylation frequency of APC is markedly increased in primary tumors, which was consistent with previous reports in rectal (Leong et al, 2011), breast (Mulligan et al, 2014), colorectal, and gastrointestinal cancers (Esteller et al, 2001). Furthermore, APC displayed higher degrees of methylation in patients with lymph node metastasis or higher TNM stages, which was also in accordance with results from breast cancer studies (Mulligan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our study revealed that methylation frequency of APC is markedly increased in primary tumors, which was consistent with previous reports in rectal (Leong et al, 2011), breast (Mulligan et al, 2014), colorectal, and gastrointestinal cancers (Esteller et al, 2001). Furthermore, APC displayed higher degrees of methylation in patients with lymph node metastasis or higher TNM stages, which was also in accordance with results from breast cancer studies (Mulligan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The absence of bisulfite conversion step is an other advantage of this method. Different studies reported a high correlation in results between standard method as bisulfite sequencing, pyrosequencing, methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR) and MS-MLPA [ESR1, CDH13 (Paulsson et al, 2009), MGMT (Jeuken et al, 2007), RASSF1 (Buyru et al, 2009), CHFR, and RARB (Chen et al, 2007), APC and RARB (Leong et al, 2011)]. In this study, we compared GSTP1 MS-MLPA and bisulfite sequencing methylation results and found a perfect agreement between these techniques, confirming the reliability of the MS-MLPA assay.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A methylation percentage for each probe was obtained using the following calculation, as described previously [22]: Methylation % ð Þ ¼ peak height of a given probe=mean height of control probes ð Þ with Hha1 peak height of a given probe=mean height of control probes ð Þ without Hha1 Â 100…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%