2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylene blue removal from aqueous solutions using a biochar/gellan gum hydrogel composite: Effect of agitation mode on sorption kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the reason may be that Na + neutralizes the negative charge on the surface of the adsorbent, reducing the adsorption effect of MG. On the other hand, ions can promote the protonation of MG, prevent the agglomeration of dye molecules, and promote adsorption [55,56]. The adsorption rate did not change significantly, and the change of ion concentration had little effect on the adsorption effect, which was consistent with the results of Elgarahy et al [57,58]. The study investigated the effects of four inorganic salts (NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 , Na 2 CO 3 and NaHCO 3 ) of 0.1 mol L −1 on the adsorption of MG by MBC.…”
Section: Effect Of Ionic Strengthsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the one hand, the reason may be that Na + neutralizes the negative charge on the surface of the adsorbent, reducing the adsorption effect of MG. On the other hand, ions can promote the protonation of MG, prevent the agglomeration of dye molecules, and promote adsorption [55,56]. The adsorption rate did not change significantly, and the change of ion concentration had little effect on the adsorption effect, which was consistent with the results of Elgarahy et al [57,58]. The study investigated the effects of four inorganic salts (NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 , Na 2 CO 3 and NaHCO 3 ) of 0.1 mol L −1 on the adsorption of MG by MBC.…”
Section: Effect Of Ionic Strengthsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Ion exchange Small amount of sludge High operation cost [4] Coagulation/flocculation low energy consumption No complete removal of heavy metals [5] Chemical precipitation Low capital cost Large amount of sludge [6] Flotation Economically efficient Low elimination efficiency [7] Membrane filtration High separation selectivity High operational cost [8] Adsorption Easy and simple operation Weak selectivity [9] Adsorption is a technology commonly employed in wastewater treatment due to its cost-effectiveness, simplicity, high efficiency, and widespread application [9]. The literature contains reports regarding the utilization of adsorbents such as zeolites, activated carbon, biochar, nanocomposites, and others [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Advantages Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption is a technology commonly employed in wastewater treatment due to its cost-effectiveness, simplicity, high efficiency, and widespread application [ 9 ]. The literature contains reports regarding the utilization of adsorbents such as zeolites, activated carbon, biochar, nanocomposites, and others [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other technologies, the adsorption process can effectively remove organic or inorganic pollutants from contaminated water and has significant advantages such as low cost, high efficiency, easy to operate, and recyclable . In the past decades, various adsorbent materials have been developed and designed for the removal of pollutants such as heavy metals, dyes, antibiotics, pesticides, nitrogen, and phosphorus elements from wastewater. However, most of the research on adsorbent materials has focused on adsorption performance as the main index, neglecting the green of raw materials and preparation processes. In recent years, with the enhancement of people’s environmental awareness, researchers are paying more and more attention to adsorbents made of natural materials. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%