2008
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.3.1064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylmercury cycling in estuarine sediment pore waters (Penobscot River estuary, Maine, USA)

Abstract: Particulate mercury (Hg)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows a 1.5-3-cm thick zone where MeHg is consumed relatively fast (zone 1; R MeHg net = À0.9 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À3.5 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ) above a zone of much slower net MeHg consumption (zone 2; R MeHg net = À0.01 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À0.03 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ). The R MeHg net values for net MeHg removal from Lake Tantaré porewater are slightly lower than those reported by Goulet et al (2007) in Lake St. Pierre (R MeHg net = À0.1 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À12.4 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ) and much lower than those reported by Merritt and Amirbahman (2008) for the highly contaminated Penobscot River-Estuary sediments (R MeHg net = À10 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À650 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ).…”
Section: Modeling the [Mehg] Profilescontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It shows a 1.5-3-cm thick zone where MeHg is consumed relatively fast (zone 1; R MeHg net = À0.9 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À3.5 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ) above a zone of much slower net MeHg consumption (zone 2; R MeHg net = À0.01 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À0.03 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ). The R MeHg net values for net MeHg removal from Lake Tantaré porewater are slightly lower than those reported by Goulet et al (2007) in Lake St. Pierre (R MeHg net = À0.1 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À12.4 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ) and much lower than those reported by Merritt and Amirbahman (2008) for the highly contaminated Penobscot River-Estuary sediments (R MeHg net = À10 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 to À650 Â 10 À21 mol cm À3 s À1 ).…”
Section: Modeling the [Mehg] Profilescontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…On this basis, we calculate that k demethyl varies between 0.04 d À1 and 0.3 d À1 in Basin A and between 0.1 d À1 and 0.8 d À1 in Basin B. These field-derived rate constant values are slightly lower than that (1.1 d À1 ) reported by Merritt and Amirbahman (2008) for the Penobscot River estuary. They can also be compared with those recently obtained in laboratory experiments where sediments or lake water samples were simultaneously spiked with low amounts of Hg(II) and MeHg labelled with different stable Hg isotopes and incubated.…”
Section: Modeling the [Mehg] Profilescontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Porewater As profiles were modeled assuming the absence of significant advective flux and the quasi steady-state (i.e., o[As]/ot % 0) of the system. Although the steady-state assumption may not be strictly valid for an environment subject to variations in dissolved O 2 and temperature, it has been useful to explore the parameters that cause either the sequestration or the mobilization of trace elements (Gallon et al, 2004;Chappaz et al, 2008;Merritt and Amirbahman, 2008) and the quantification of As postdepositional mobility (Couture et al, 2008). For this modeling exercise, the one-dimensional mass conservation equation provided by Boudreau (1997) at steady-state:…”
Section: Net Reaction Rates Of Porewater As Production or Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-shore sediments may be an important source of MeHg to marine organisms, including fish consumed by humans (Chen et al, 2008). Estuaries are highly variable with respect to geochemical characteristics and have a high potential for sequestration and methylation of Hg (e.g., Hines et al, 2006; Lambertsson and Nilsson, 2006; Merritt and Amirbahman, 2008; Schartup et al, 2013; Liu et al, 2015) due to high pore-water sulfate (SO42) concentrations, great amounts of labile sediment organic carbon, and a relatively shallow redox transition in the sediment. The fate of Hg in the sediment is dependent on sediment disturbances (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%