1993
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199302000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methylmethacrylate Plasma Levels During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vivo situation is likely to allow a certain degree of clearance and removal of such unreacted monomers from the site of implantation and therefore reduce the potential effects. It has been said that MMA is cleared within minutes in humans 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vivo situation is likely to allow a certain degree of clearance and removal of such unreacted monomers from the site of implantation and therefore reduce the potential effects. It has been said that MMA is cleared within minutes in humans 34…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other problems with PMMA cement include the biological response (Thomson et al 1992), leakage of the monomer of methylmethacrylate (Gentil et al 1993) and a high curing temperature (Leeson and Lippitt 1993) which damages cell activity (Jones and Hungerford 1987). In addition, the wear debris from high-density polyethylene (HDP), PMMA cement and metal may be taken up by macrophages in fibrous tissue (Willert, Bertram and Buchorn 1990;Manley and Serekian 1994;Shanbhag et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a possible correlation with these complications when large amounts of unbound monomer are applied to a large bone surface area or a 'plunger' effect results in fat embolism [18][19][20]. In addition, MMA has been reported to be detectable in both plasma and breast milk following joint surgery, and considering its widespread use, MMA has a low incidence of associated complications [21,22]. The primary problem reported with MMA implants in regions other than facial bones is infection, with rates near 20% at 1 to 2 years after implantation [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%