2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11228-009-0122-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metric Regularity of Mappings and Generalized Normals to Set Images

Abstract: Abstract. The primary goal of this paper is to study some notions of normals to nonconvex sets in finite-dimensional and infinite-dimensional spaces and their images under single-valued and set.-valued mappings. The main motivation for our study comes from variational analysis and optimization. ·where the problems under consideration play a crucial role in many important aspects of generalized differential calculus and applications. Our major results provide precise equality formulas (sometimes just efiicient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that Theorem 4.1 holds as formulated in arbitrary Banach spaces, where the notion of nondegeneracy is taken from [4,Definition 4.70] without assuming the finite-dimensionality of the spaces in question. Indeed, the only change in the proof given above is to replace the application of the finite-dimensional result from [40,Theorem 6.43] by its Banach space counterpart from [25,Theorem 4.2] ensuring the equality in (4.5) and hence in (4.1) under the surjectivity assumption imposed on ∇g(ȳ). In this way we can also derive the Banach space version of second-order chain rule from [35,Theorem 7] for the limiting constructions.…”
Section: Proof It Follows From the Well-known Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that Theorem 4.1 holds as formulated in arbitrary Banach spaces, where the notion of nondegeneracy is taken from [4,Definition 4.70] without assuming the finite-dimensionality of the spaces in question. Indeed, the only change in the proof given above is to replace the application of the finite-dimensional result from [40,Theorem 6.43] by its Banach space counterpart from [25,Theorem 4.2] ensuring the equality in (4.5) and hence in (4.1) under the surjectivity assumption imposed on ∇g(ȳ). In this way we can also derive the Banach space version of second-order chain rule from [35,Theorem 7] for the limiting constructions.…”
Section: Proof It Follows From the Well-known Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If Φ : X ⇒ Y is Lipschitz l.s.c. at (x, ȳ), then its inverse mapping Φ −1 : Y ⇒ X is hemiregular (alias, semiregular) at (ȳ, x), as understood in [5,13,15,21].…”
Section: Lipschitz Semicontinuity and Calmness Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The part (i) ⇒(ii) appeared in [1] (see also [2]) with basically the same proof as below. It is an integrated part in deriving generalized differential calculus rules involving direct and inverse images under the restrictive metric regular mappings (see [1,3,2]). Note that this result is similar to the so-called lifting property of sequences as in [9] (Section 2.4); see Theorem 2.4f therein.…”
Section: Some Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this concept was also successfully employed to obtain more normal cone relations involving direct set images in [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%