Metrics and Dashboard for Level 2 – Experience

Steger, Bernhardt; Ekert, Damjan; Messnarz, Richard; Štolfa, Jakub; Štolfa, Svatopluk; Velart, Zdenek

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_49

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This means that most organizations understood the base practices (capability level 1) but the rating on capability level 2 to 5 (efficiency questions for PA2.1 performance management, PA 2.2 work product management, PA 3.1 Process Definition, etc.) [65] (see Figure 2) needs an assessor training explaining the ISO 33020 process measurement framework.…”

Section: Conclusion Experiences and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Messnarz,

Aschbacher,

Ekert

et al. 2024

Innovation - Research and Development for Human, Economic and Institutional Growth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

TIMS (Training in Innovation Management System for Sustainable SMEs) is an EU Erasmus+ project which analyzed the ISO (International Standardisation Organisation) 56000 innovation management system norm parts and configured in 2022 an ISO 56000-based innovation assessment portal. This system allows self-assessment, independent expert assessment, and benchmarking for innovation management. In 2023, a competence matrix and related training materials to support the implementation of ISO 56000 is developed. The ISO 56000-based assessment tool applied ISO 33020 for process capability assessment for ISO 56000 and this allows us to determine the capability of ISO 56000 processes. This paper gives an overview of which processes have been derived from ISO 56000 and how the PAM (Innovation Process Assessment Model) is structured. Since ISO 33020 provides a standard method to determine process attributes and capability level profiles of innovation management system processes, the method also allows a Europe (and worldwide) benchmarking of the capability of innovation management systems. The objective of TIMS is to establish an assessment system and training to roll out ISO 56000 to the European industry. The tools and training materials will be used by universities in lecturing programs and by innovation agents in the industry.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion Experiences and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Messnarz,

Aschbacher,

Ekert

et al. 2024

Innovation - Research and Development for Human, Economic and Institutional Growth

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nowadays with rapid technological progress, the automotive sector ] [Stolfa 2020 b] and car development tackle many challenges. One of them is to assure appropriate fail-safe operation of the systems for the vehicles with the higher autonomous levels.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The traceability of those vehicle functions to ECU functions and components inside the ECU are checked by Automotive SPICE assessments and the traceability includes functional, non-functional, safety and cybersecurity requirements and functionality [Ekert 2020] [Höhn 2016] [Kreiner 2013] [Kreiner 2014] [Kreiner 2015] [Messnarz 2019 b] [Steger 2020]. These assessments check such functional designs, effect chains and dynamic views.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety Design Strategies in Highly Autonomous Drive Level 2 – Lateral Control Decomposition Concept

Štolfa¹,

Štolfa²,

Simonik³

et al. 2021

jucs

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper is based on an experimental study at VSB TUO Ostrava with a DEMOCAR vehicle that simulates a real car with sensor fusion concept and a vehicle gateway to send and coordinate commands to ECUs to realize and manage autonomous driving. In this experimental study of autonomous driving vehicles control, a HARA (Hazard and Risk Analysis, ISO 26262:2018) has been done on vehicle level and strategies have been defined and implemented to manage safety situations where the car lateral control shall be hand over to a driver when in HAD 2 mode. The issue is that the switching to safe state shall not be done immediately but the vehicle has to stay in safe driving mode – fail-operational up to 4 seconds until a driver can take over. The UECE and other relevant studies show that it can take up to 6 seconds if driver/operator is not in the flow (HAD 3) and up to the 2 seconds when driver is in the flow (HAD 1). The paper makes assumptions and proposals about vehicle lateral control strategy to ensure the smooth take- over of the car by driver and its impact on control software development architectures.

show abstract

Bachmann¹,

Steger²

2021

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metrics and Dashboard for Level 2 – Experience

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Safety Design Strategies in Highly Autonomous Drive Level 2 – Lateral Control Decomposition Concept

FMEA Integration in Requirements Management as a Basis for an Automotive SPICE© Level 3 Project

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Metrics and Dashboard for Level 2 – Experience

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Innovation Management System Assessment and Benchmarking

Safety Design Strategies in Highly Autonomous Drive Level 2 &ndash; Lateral Control Decomposition Concept

FMEA Integration in Requirements Management as a Basis for an Automotive SPICE© Level 3 Project

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Safety Design Strategies in Highly Autonomous Drive Level 2 – Lateral Control Decomposition Concept