Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/3dpvt.2006.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics and Optimization Techniques for Registration of Color to Laser Range Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The image is re-rendered based on that calibration, and two or more passes of that process are applied, but this time with an affine 2D transform followed by a deformable transform. Image comparison is done using an expectation maximization variation [12] that combines good adaptability for comparison of images of different modalities and a relatively linear search space to avoid falling into local minima, an issue for this kind of application when using this metric [13]. By rendering after each step, we ensure that the rendered part of the 3D model really corresponds to the part visible in the image, but also compensates for limitations in the deformation model used by the registration algorithm.…”
Section: B Supervised Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image is re-rendered based on that calibration, and two or more passes of that process are applied, but this time with an affine 2D transform followed by a deformable transform. Image comparison is done using an expectation maximization variation [12] that combines good adaptability for comparison of images of different modalities and a relatively linear search space to avoid falling into local minima, an issue for this kind of application when using this metric [13]. By rendering after each step, we ensure that the rendered part of the 3D model really corresponds to the part visible in the image, but also compensates for limitations in the deformation model used by the registration algorithm.…”
Section: B Supervised Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some range sensors are capable of recording the intensity of the reflected sensing light at each range sample, and to reduce noise, the sensing light is often not in the visible light spectrum. Williams et al [Williams et al 2004] and Hantak and Lastra [Hantak and Lastra 2006] use the dependence between color and the infra-red intensity at each range sample, and several similarity measures, such as mutual information and chi-square statistics, are used to search for the best match. For this approach, good camera pose initialization is crucial to derive the correct camera pose.…”
Section: Automatic Image-to-geometry Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this approach, good camera pose initialization is crucial to derive the correct camera pose. The registration results of different information-theoretic metrics are compared in [Hantak and Lastra 2006]. Also, Pong and Cham [Pong and Cham 2006] have explored mutual information between image intensity and object surface normals for the alignment of 3D objects to their 2D images.…”
Section: Automatic Image-to-geometry Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image is re-rendered based on that calibration, and two or or more passes of that process are applied, but this time with an affine 2D transform followed by a deformable transform. Image comparison is done using an expectation maximization variation [8] that combines good adaptability for comparison of images of different modalities and a relatively linear search space to avoid falling into local minima, an issue for this kind of application when using this metric [2]. By re-rendering after each step, we insure that the rendered part of the 3D model really corresponds to the part visible in the image,but also compensates for limitations in the deformation model used by the registration algorithm.…”
Section: Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hantak [2] provides a good litterature review and classification of automatic registration techniques and compares different image-based similarity metrics for 3D/2D Special thanks to Prof. V. Valzano and A. Bandiera, Coordinamento SIBA, Universit del Salento, Lecce, Italia. intensity registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%