2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-014-9229-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrics for Generalized Persistence Modules

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the question of defining interleaving metrics on generalized persistence modules over arbitrary preordered sets. Our constructions are functorial, which implies a form of stability for these metrics. We describe a large class of examples, inverseimage persistence modules, which occur whenever a topological space is mapped to a metric space. Several standard theories of persistence and their stability can be described in this framework. This includes the classical case of sublevelset persi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
162
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) is a direct consequence of the definitions; (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) follow from (1), and (7) from (6).…”
Section: The Shift Is Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) is a direct consequence of the definitions; (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) follow from (1), and (7) from (6).…”
Section: The Shift Is Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Given a 1-Lipschitz map f ∈ Met(M, N ), define f R : M R → N R via the mapping (x, s) → (f (x), s). Proof.…”
Section: The Interpolation Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a small category C, we will denote the category of functors from C to D by D C . Although we will survey some relevant definitions and results here, the reader is invited to consult [5,6,8,10,23] for detailed background material on the categorical and metric aspects of persistence modules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.1 Related work de Silva et al (2016) showed that any Reeb graph can be identified with a constructible Set-valued cosheaf on R [16]. Thus, Reeb graphs can be thought of as generalized persistence modules in the setting of Bubenik et al (2015) [8]. A generalized persistence module is any functor F : P → C from a poset P to a category C [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Reeb graphs can be thought of as generalized persistence modules in the setting of Bubenik et al (2015) [8]. A generalized persistence module is any functor F : P → C from a poset P to a category C [8]. When P = (R, ≤) the poset of real numbers and C = vect k is the category of finite dimensional k-vector spaces, we obtain the notion of a pointwise finite dimensional (p.f.d.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%