2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3128961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metro Anomaly Detection Based on Light Strip Inductive Key Frame Extraction and MAGAN Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By designing a S-Net to transfer the feature extraction capability of the pre-trained model, and the exclusive use of normal samples for training, the T-Net and S-Net in the T-S model are capable of producing distinct features for abnormal images. In order to obtain multi-scale abnormal features, US [18] uses an ensemble learning method, while STPM [29] and MKD [30] choose to calculate multi-scale feature differences. Kohei et al [62] further improve the model in [29] using consistency between layer groups.…”
Section: Knowledge Distillation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By designing a S-Net to transfer the feature extraction capability of the pre-trained model, and the exclusive use of normal samples for training, the T-Net and S-Net in the T-S model are capable of producing distinct features for abnormal images. In order to obtain multi-scale abnormal features, US [18] uses an ensemble learning method, while STPM [29] and MKD [30] choose to calculate multi-scale feature differences. Kohei et al [62] further improve the model in [29] using consistency between layer groups.…”
Section: Knowledge Distillation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By designing a S-Net to transfer the feature extraction capability of the pre-trained model, and the exclusive use of normal samples for training, the T-Net and S-Net in the T-S model are capable of producing distinct features for abnormal images. In order to obtain multi-scale abnormal features, US [18] uses an ensemble learning method, while STPM [28] and MKD [29] choose to calculate multi-scale feature differences. Kohei et al [56] further improve the model in [28] using consistency between layer groups.…”
Section: Knowledge Distillation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image space-based methods compare the difference between the input and reconstructed images in a pixel-bypixel or patch-by-patch manner to highlight potential abnormal areas. Liu et al [33] designed an unsupervised network based on a dilating fine-grained generator (a nested U-Net [34] structure), a multipatch discriminator, and a local-attentive reconstruction loss. The proposed generator largely suppresses the reconstruction of anomalies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%