Metropolitan Growth Patterns and Socio-Economic Disparity in Six US Metropolitan Areas 1970-2000

Abstract

Abstracti jur_1004 988..1011Widening socio-economic disparities between urban and suburban communities have increasingly concerned urban scholars and policymakers. This is because growing disparities may be associated with the socio-economic exclusion of disadvantaged households from jobs, housing and public services. However, existing empirical studies have not sufficiently addressed the importance of regional growth patterns that are associated with socio-economic disparity and polarization within metropolitan areas. After identifying the intra-metropolitan subareas of six metropolitan areas and utilizing longitudinal census data from 1970 to 2000, this research investigated intrametropolitan socio-economic disparity and polarization in terms of income, class and race within six metropolitan areas exhibiting different regional growth trends and patterns. The primary focus of this research is the relationship between socio-economic disparity and regional growth trends as well as patterns that pertain to both urban sprawl and compact development. The key findings of this study indicate that while metropolitan areas with compact development patterns show a relatively lower level of intra-metropolitan socio-economic disparity and polarization, those with urban sprawl exhibit a higher level over time, despite endogenous differences in each metropolitan area. Finally, this study discusses the issue of causality among spatial patterns and socio-economic disparities as well as policy implications for promoting metropolitan growth patterns aimed at socio-economic integration and balanced metropolitan growth.

Are Millennials Coming to Town? Residential Location Choice of Young Adults

“…Thus, during the period, the population distribution shifted to the downtown and suburban areas, at the expense of inner city (and peripheral) areas, which is consistent not only with the back-to-the-city thesis but also with its opponents, those arguing for sustained suburban growth. The falling share, and sometimes number, of people in the inner city bands is consistent with previous studies that discussed the overall decline of the area (Hanlon 2008; Lee 2011; Lee and Leigh 2007). After 2010, however, there has been dramatic change in the growth pattern.…”

Rates and patterns of land use change in the Upper Great Lakes States, USA: A framework for spatial temporal analysis

“…This migration led to large increases in urban development along the rural-urban fringe, spiking the percentage gain in urban development vs. population growth. The sprawl associated with residents migrating to suburban areas in the DMA led to increased income and racial segregation within the inner city and inner suburb rings while decreasing segregation in outer suburban rings (Lee, 2011). In contrast to the high elasticity index of the DMA resulting from suburban immigration, the low elasticity index of the TCMA is likely a result of efforts by entities within the region (e.g., the Metropolitan Council) to implement regional planning and enforce Metropolitan Urban Service Areas (or urban growth boundaries).…”

Lost in protest, found in segregation: Divided cities in the light of the 2015 “Οχι” referendum in Greece

“…Urban expansion has become a prominent issue at the global scale due to the complex link between features, dynamics and consequences of urbanization and the socioeconomic pattern of metropolitan regions (Kazepov, 2005;Lee, 2011). Processes driving urban expansion are inherently related to socioeconomic factors making the interplay between form and functions an intriguing e but intricate e research topic (Malheiros, 2002;Keddie & Tonkiss, 2010;García, Eizaguirre, & Pradel, 2015).…”