2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metropolitan restructuring in post-liberalized India: Separating the global and the local

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, growth is not evenly distributed over time either. This situation indicates the lack of land in the central part for residential development (Bagchi 1987;Shaw and Satish 2007;Sengupta 2006;Roy 2011;Bhatta 2009) and the availability of sufficient land in the periphery including suitable environment. During 2001-2011, Sonarpur and Rajarhat area have faced significant changes both in builtup areas and population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, growth is not evenly distributed over time either. This situation indicates the lack of land in the central part for residential development (Bagchi 1987;Shaw and Satish 2007;Sengupta 2006;Roy 2011;Bhatta 2009) and the availability of sufficient land in the periphery including suitable environment. During 2001-2011, Sonarpur and Rajarhat area have faced significant changes both in builtup areas and population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern of growth, with the city core becoming increasingly saturated, and new urbanization centres developing at the periphery, can be traced to multiple factors. High land prices in the city centre and lack of large spaces for further urbanization have led to the location of many public sectors, local and multinational companies, and prominent educational institutions at the city periphery [31]. [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].…”
Section: The Case Of Bengalurumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, urban growth management is facing the much more challenges stemming from the uncertainties of local developments. A mount of literature have already verified that kinds of affects of decentralisation on urban growth management in the developing countries, for example in Africa (Kombe, 2005), in Asia (Rondinelli, 1991) and in some individual countries, such as in India (Shaw & Satish, 2007;Zé rah, 2007), in Indonesia (Ranis & Stewart, 1994), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Among these forms of institutions, governance institutions establish the rules that are used by governments to enact policy initiatives and formulate the approaches through which government changes its relationships with other organizations involved in governance. Recent work on metropolitan growth in developed countries (for example, Carruthers, 2003;Lewis, 1996) as well as developing countries (for example, Shaw & Satish, 2007;Zhang, 2000Zhang, , 2002 has suggested that changes in governance institutions have a significant influence on urban spatial changes and suburban development. To a great extent, metropolitan spatial changes can be viewed as the product of the rescaling of state power among different sectors (central government and local governments; governmental sectors and non-government sectors) (Shaw and Satish, 2007;Shen, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%