Classroom dynamics research has added to our understanding about the ways teachers communicate their expectations to students (e.g., Brophy & Good, 1984), how students perceive differential teacher behaviors (e.g., Weinstein, Marshall, Sharp, & Botkin, 1987), and their effect on students' own perceptions of ability and achievement (Rubie-Davies, 2006). Despite the established presence of classroom dynamics in teacher preparation programs (e.g., Barnes, 1987) and licensure standards (e.g., Council of Chief State School Officers, 2011), historically marginalized students who face particularly onerous obstacles associated with poverty and prejudice continue to be underrepresented in a vast array of achievement outcomes (e.g., National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], 2015). Scholars have argued that there are unique competencies that are essential to the effective teaching of historically marginalized students (Ladson-Billings, 1999). Among these competencies is asset-based pedagogy 1 (ABP) that views students' culture as a strength, countering the more widespread view that inordinate achievement disparities stem from deficiencies in the child and/or child's culture. Cumulatively, ABP scholarship shares a fundamental belief that teachers who possess an understanding of the sociohistorical influences on traditional marginalized students' trajectories (critical awareness) are better able to cultivate students' knowledge by building on their prior knowledge (cultural knowledge) and incorporating knowledge that validates students' experiences (cultural content integration) into their instruction. Accordingly, ABP is believed to help students develop identities that promote achievement outcomes. Although scholarship reflecting ABP is prominent in the teacher education literature, scholars have urged researchers to address the paucity of studies that explicitly link teachers' ABP beliefs and behaviors to student outcomes (Goldenberg,