Mexican Exceptionalism: Globalization and De-Industrialization, 1750–1877

Abstract

Like the rest of the poor periphery, Mexico fought with de-industrialization in the century before the 1870s. Yet, Mexican manufacturing defended itself better than did the rest of the poor periphery. Why Mexicanexceptionalism? This article decomposes the sources of de-industrialization into productivity events abroad, globalization forces connecting Mexico to those markets, and domestic forces. It uses a neo-Ricardian model to implement the decomposition, advocates a price dual approach, and develops a new price and wage data base. Mexicanexceptionalismwas due to weaker Dutch disease effects, better wage competitiveness, and the policy autonomy to foster industry.

The Evolution of Income and Inequality among Mexico City’s Construction Workers during the “Independence Era”: 1783-1853

“…In between the fall of New Spain and the emergence of modern Mexico, the political economy experienced significant changes in terms of the relative power, production, and institutional organization (Cárdenas, 1984;Chowning, 1991;Coatsworth, 1978;Dobado, Gómez-Galvarriato and Williamson, 2008;Salvucci, 1997;Sánchez-Santiró, 2001). With this backdrop of transformation, how did the distribution of income change?…”

The Periphery's Terms of Trade in the Nineteenth Century: A Methodological Problem Revisited

“…For 1801---28, silver price for Px; Pm is an index of British export prices. 67 For 1829---76, silver for Px; Pm is a chained Laspeyres index calculated from US trade statistics. 68 For 187668 For ---1913, Px is a chained Laspeyres index calculated from British commodity prices; Pm is a reweighted US wholesale price index.…”