2007
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00275.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mg2+ activates the ryanodine receptor type 2 (RyR2) at intermediate Ca2+ concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(88 reference statements)
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of Mg 2+ inhibition would be possible through competition at H sites and a conformational state at the Ca 2+ biphasic plateau, which reduces the affinity of Mg 2+ at L sites relative to conformations at low (3 and 10μM) and high (100μM) Ca 2+ . Alternatively, Mg 2+ binding could impart an activating effect on H sites, as suggested for rat RyR2 [31]. This further supports allosteric coupling between H and L sites and suggests Ca 2+ may contribute along with DHPR [18] and oxidation [19] to relieving the inherent physiological block provided by Mg 2+ .…”
Section: Mg 2+ Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loss of Mg 2+ inhibition would be possible through competition at H sites and a conformational state at the Ca 2+ biphasic plateau, which reduces the affinity of Mg 2+ at L sites relative to conformations at low (3 and 10μM) and high (100μM) Ca 2+ . Alternatively, Mg 2+ binding could impart an activating effect on H sites, as suggested for rat RyR2 [31]. This further supports allosteric coupling between H and L sites and suggests Ca 2+ may contribute along with DHPR [18] and oxidation [19] to relieving the inherent physiological block provided by Mg 2+ .…”
Section: Mg 2+ Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is also noteworthy that previously published whole cell Ca 2+ imaging experiments indicate these chimeras expressed in 1B5 cells are functional, with all three constructs exhibiting calcium-induced Ca 2+ release (CICR) and Ch-4 and −21 additionally engaging skeletal-type EC-coupling [20]. Interestingly, a recent [ 3 H]Ry-binding study with membranes isolated from rat ventricular muscle showed a similar biphasic Ca 2+ activation curve for RyR2, which was reverted to a monophasic binding profile in the presence of Mg 2+ [31]. Collectively these results support a mechanism by which coordinated Ca 2+ activation sites regulate RyR conformations that bind ryanodine with high affinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Very recently, Mg 2+ has been suggested to also exhibit a stimulating effect on RYR2 in an intermediate concentration range of Ca 2+ (10 -100 μ M) ( Chugun et al, 2007 ). These authors showed that Mg 2+ renders the RYR2 more sensitive to modulators of CICR, such as caffeine, ␤ , ␥ -methylene ATP, procaine, and calmodulin.…”
Section: Control Of Intracellular Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the reported inhibition of RyR2 by Ca 2+ CaM is often exceedingly small (Yamaguchi et al, 2004;Xu and Meissner, 2004) and, interestingly, there are also rare reports suggesting that CaM may activate RyR2 (Fruen et al, 2000;Chugun et al, 2007 Xu and Meissner, 2004) and Ca 2+ -spark generation in cardiac cells (Lukyanenko and Gyorke, 1999;Ai et al, 2005;Guo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that Ca 2+ CaM can cause partial inhibition of both cardiac and skeletal (RyR1) isoforms of RyR (Fruen et al, 2000;Balshaw et al, 2001). Additionally, apoCaM is known to activate RyR1, but has little effect on RyR2 Tripathy et al, 1995;Fruen et al, 2000).The magnitude of the reported inhibition of RyR2 by Ca 2+ CaM is often exceedingly small (Yamaguchi et al, 2004;Xu and Meissner, 2004) and, interestingly, there are also rare reports suggesting that CaM may activate RyR2 (Fruen et al, 2000;Chugun et al, 2007 Xu and Meissner, 2004) and Ca 2+ -spark generation in cardiac cells (Lukyanenko and Gyorke, 1999;Ai et al, 2005;Guo et al, 2006).As CaM can be immunoprecipitated with RyR2 (Ai et al, 2005), and as the t1/2 for [ 35 S]CaM dissociation from cardiac SR is approximately 9 min for Ca 2+ CaM and 40 s for apoCaM (Balshaw et al, 2001), it is likely that some CaM is always bound tightly to RyR2 in situ, and may provide a certain level of 'constitutive' modulation of channel function. To experimentally investigate this modulation in cardiac cells, it is necessary first to remove the CaM attached to RyR2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%