2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MHC class I and class II presentation of tumor antigen in retrovirally and adenovirally transduced dendritic cells

Abstract: The unique antigen -presenting capabilities of dendritic cells ( DCs ) make them an attractive means with which to initiate an antitumor immune response. Using DCs transduced with tumor antigens for immunotherapy has several theoretical advantages over peptide -pulsed DCs including the possibility that transduced DCs are capable of presenting epitopes on both class I and class II MHC molecules. To test this theory, we inserted the human tumor antigen gp100 into mouse DCs transgenic for HLA -DRb1*0401 using eit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,28 Owing to these features and establishment of methods for expansion of human and rodent DCs on a large scale from hematopoietic precursors in the presence of appropriate cytokine cocktails, [29][30][31] DCs have attracted great attention as vehicles for the delivery of cancer vaccines. The efficacy of different viral vectors, including retroviral vector, 8,32 Ad, [8][9][10][11][12] and lentiviral vector, 33,34 has been evaluated for genetic modification of DCs. Among them, Ad was confirmed as a good candidate because of its high efficiency and minimum risk associated with insertional mutagenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,28 Owing to these features and establishment of methods for expansion of human and rodent DCs on a large scale from hematopoietic precursors in the presence of appropriate cytokine cocktails, [29][30][31] DCs have attracted great attention as vehicles for the delivery of cancer vaccines. The efficacy of different viral vectors, including retroviral vector, 8,32 Ad, [8][9][10][11][12] and lentiviral vector, 33,34 has been evaluated for genetic modification of DCs. Among them, Ad was confirmed as a good candidate because of its high efficiency and minimum risk associated with insertional mutagenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, TAA gene-modified DCs may also present MHC class IIrestricted epitope(s) to CD4 þ T cells, and can express TAA continuously and MHC-peptide complexes for long periods. [7][8][9] Among various techniques for transferring the TAA gene to DCs, the ex vivo engineering of DCs using adenovirus vector (Ad) provides encouraging results. [10][11][12] However, the low or lack of coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (primary Ad-receptor) expression on the DC surface makes sufficient gene transduction to DCs by conventional Ad difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transduction of DCs with viral vectors that have been engineered to express TAAs can result in high levels of transgene expression necessary for a strong immune response [16]. Various viral vectors, including poxvirus [40], adenovirus [41], and conventional oncoretrovirus [42], have been used to genetically modify DCs. LVs offer several advantages over other vectors for targeting DCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplified DNAs were ligated into the previously described anti-erbB2-CD28-z chimeric construct, 26 as depicted in Figure 1, which was incorporated into the retroviral expression plasmid, CLNCX. 31 The TLR4 transmembrane domain was retained in that construct since CD14 association with TLR4 is necessary for optimal function, 32 and transmembrane domains can be involved in molecular associations.…”
Section: Cell Lines and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Briefly, plasmids containing the chimeric receptor and the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) envelope were transfected into 293gp cells (30 mg of each per 10 7 cells) using Lipofectamine 2000 according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Following replenishment of media 24 h later, supernatant containing retroviral vector was harvested after a further 24 h and used to transduce JAWS II cells using 8 mg/ml polybrene and centrifugation at 1000 g for 1 hr/RT.…”
Section: Cell Lines and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%