2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mHealth for Safer Deliveries: A mixed methods evaluation of the effect of an integrated mobile health intervention on maternal care utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,16 In the present study, 101 women out of 102 in study group (one woman aborted at 12 weeks) and 102 in control group had institutional deliveries which were high when compared to study done by Battle et al where 75% delivered at a facility and 78% delivered under skilled care. 18 In our study, a significant difference was noted in Hb% in last visit in study group [p-0.004] when compared to a study done by Khorshid et al where no effect on anaemia was found, as there were no significant differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit in study group. 19 There was no significant difference noted in both groups in this study in terms of age, risk factors, literacy status which is similar to study done by Lund et al 16 The limitations of m-health are that compliance of health workers for handling the software application may be low.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…17,16 In the present study, 101 women out of 102 in study group (one woman aborted at 12 weeks) and 102 in control group had institutional deliveries which were high when compared to study done by Battle et al where 75% delivered at a facility and 78% delivered under skilled care. 18 In our study, a significant difference was noted in Hb% in last visit in study group [p-0.004] when compared to a study done by Khorshid et al where no effect on anaemia was found, as there were no significant differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit in study group. 19 There was no significant difference noted in both groups in this study in terms of age, risk factors, literacy status which is similar to study done by Lund et al 16 The limitations of m-health are that compliance of health workers for handling the software application may be low.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In Zanzibar, technology has been introduced by a nongovernmental organization but ownership is being transferred to the government. 3 In Malawi, the government has been working with funders and consultants to develop a digital health strategy. 35 What is common to these three models and most other examples is that the government has a central role in defining the policies and strategies for digital health, whereas implementation is often led by outside private groups.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent project in Zanzibar, Tanzania, has shown how the use of digital technology has been able to significantly increase the ability of women to access safer delivery services. 3 In India, Uganda, and Tanzania, ambulance services focused on the use of digital protocols and access have replaced the largely nonexistent public system. In South Africa, two million young women have access to accurate information about sex, health, and motherhood through a national online service run by the government.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undertaking a comprehensive implementation science study is particularly important when studying mHealth interventions, as the health care system itself is complex, includes multiple interacting components, and interventions must be adapted to fit the needs of a practice setting and patients with different views and expectations [ 19 , 20 ]. However, to our knowledge there is no tested tool that can be continuously used to evaluate, monitor, and inform mHealth implementation processes as they unfold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%