mHealth Interventions to Reduce Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Background Children and adolescents increasingly do not meet physical activity (PA) recommendations. Hence, insufficient PA (IPA) and sedentary behavior (SB) among children and adolescents are relevant behavior change domains for using individualized mobile health (mHealth) interventions. Objective This review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on IPA and SB, with a special focus on the age and level of individualization. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and March 2021. mHealth interventions for primary prevention in children and adolescents addressing behavior change related to IPA and SB were included. Included studies were compared for content characteristics and methodological quality and summarized narratively. In addition, a meta-analysis with a subsequent exploratory meta-regression examining the moderating effects of age and individualization on overall effectiveness was performed. Results On the basis of the inclusion criteria, 1.3% (11/828) of the preliminary identified studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 1.2% (10/828) were included in the meta-analysis. Trials included a total of 1515 participants (mean age (11.69, SD 0.788 years; 65% male and 35% female) self-reported (3/11, 27%) or device-measured (8/11, 73%) health data on the duration of SB and IPA for an average of 9.3 (SD 5.6) weeks. Studies with high levels of individualization significantly decreased insufficient PA levels (Cohen d=0.33; 95% CI 0.08-0.58; Z=2.55; P=.01), whereas those with low levels of individualization (Cohen d=−0.06; 95% CI −0.32 to 0.20; Z=0.48; P=.63) or targeting SB (Cohen d=−0.11; 95% CI −0.01 to 0.23; Z=1.73; P=.08) indicated no overall significant effect. The heterogeneity of the studies was moderate to low, and significant subgroup differences were found between trials with high and low levels of individualization (χ21=4.0; P=.04; I2=75.2%). Age as a moderator variable showed a small effect; however, the results were not significant, which might have been because of being underpowered. Conclusions Evidence suggests that mHealth interventions for children and adolescents can foster moderate reductions in IPA but not SB. Moreover, individualized mHealth interventions to reduce IPA seem to be more effective for adolescents than for children. Although, to date, only a few mHealth studies have addressed inactive and sedentary young people, and their quality of evidence is moderate, these findings indicate the relevance of individualization on the one hand and the difficulties in reducing SB using mHealth interventions on the other. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020209417; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=209417

A randomized controlled trial of an mHealth application with nursing interaction to promote quality of life among community-dwelling older adults

“…Self-efficacy refers to the perceived capability or belief that one can perform a targeted behavior ( 38 ). It remains a robust predictor of various health behaviors ( 39 ). An increase in the level of self-efficacy is often associated with the perception of a lowering of barriers to engaging in health behaviors, which in turn translates into an increased level of motivation to participate in the required activity ( 40 ).…”

Efficacy of Individualized Sensory-Based mHealth Interventions to Improve Distress Coping in Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Moreover, the lack of supervision during the intervention in the mHealth interventions forced the participants to self-pace the intervention. This is a major disadvantage compared to supervised interventions [ 82 , 83 , 84 ]. Therefore, we conclude, that this type of mHealth intervention should include motivational aspects and guidance to do additional structured physical exercise next to the App use.…”

“…In particular, non-individualized interventions were found to decrease user satisfaction [ 82 ]. However, the definition of an individualized health app remains unknown due to the lack of a framework for individualized app elements [ 83 ]. In the context of mHealth, individualization is defined as an adaptation to the needs or special circumstances of an individual and the lack of such is cited as one of the main barriers that prevent patients from behavior change [ 84 , 85 ].…”

mHealth interventions to reduce stress in healthcare workers (fitcor): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

“…However, the definition of a tailored health app is unclear due to the lack of a framework for individualized app elements. In one of the few reviews that adequately addresses this issue, the authors enumerate the Individualized Elements in the app and grade whether it is a tailored or non-tailored mHealth intervention [ 77 ]. The evidence of this review is clear, however, that there is a wide range of potential approaches for individualization and that these are often accompanied by established behavior change mechanisms, yet the effectiveness of individual elements must first be investigated in stand-alone interventions, as tailored mHealth interventions are often multicomponent in nature.…”