Micellar and related biphasic solution systems have been used in many fields of chemistry instead of liquid-liquid systems, [1][2][3][4][5] because of the unique characteristics that the solutions can be handled safely and are environmentally-friendly while each system seems to have two phases without the use of toxic and/or flammable organic solvent. Many studies on the extraction of metals with water-insoluble chelating reagents using this useful medium have been reported, not only for applications in separation and preconcentration 6-9 but also for fundamental research on the equilibria and kinetics of the extraction. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The author has been interested in differences of extraction efficiencies in both equilibria and kinetics between micellar and conventional liquid-liquid systems and has studied to determine the effectiveness and possibility of the pseudophase system being applied for a practical separation/determination medium as to be an analogy of droplets of organic solvents. 17,18 During the kinetic study of the extraction of iron(III) with benzoylacetone (Hbza) and benzoyltrifluoroacetone (Hbfa) into Triton X-100 micelle, the extraction mechanism with the latter extractant was found to be somewhat different from that in a conventional non-polar organic solvent-water system such as hexane-water, although the whole extraction equilibria in the micellar system can be analyzed by a manner similar to that in the liquid-liquid system. 17 The ligands had no long alkyl chains and no additional salt was dissolved in the bulk aqueous phase during the study; thus the whole formation/extraction reaction in the system should be controlled by formation of the monocomplex in the bulk aqueous phase. All the overall reactions with Hbza were controlled only by the formation of the monocomplex in the bulk aqueous phase; however, the rate for Hbfa extraction was slower than that for the complex formation in the bulk aqueous phase as estimated from the partition constant of the extractant. The effect found in the Hbfa extraction system has been observed also in the other trifluoromethyl substituted β-diketone system.
19Such differences may affect the efficiencies of analysis i.e., separation factor or determination time, and thus, thorough considerations are necessary to utilize the medium for practical analytical processes.In the present study, the rate of formation/extraction of iron(III) with trifluoroacetylacetone in the Triton X-100 micellar system has been investigated and compared with the rate of complex formation measured separately in aqueous solutions in order to clarify the change of the extraction rate. The ligand is much simpler and more water soluble than Hbfa; thus the rate of complex formation in the aqueous phase can be measured easily and the difference in the mechanism of complex formation in these solutions can be discussed precisely.
ExperimentalAll the reagents were of analytical grade and were used without purification. The trifluoroacetylacetone (1,1,1-trifluoro-2,4-pentaned...