2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of cadmium and zinc: Use of response surface methodology to improve understanding of process performance and optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al [199] used polysulfone hollow ultrafiltration membrane and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as surfactant. Landaburu-Aguirrea et al [200] also used MEUF for the removal of Cd(II).…”
Section: Ultrafiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [199] used polysulfone hollow ultrafiltration membrane and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as surfactant. Landaburu-Aguirrea et al [200] also used MEUF for the removal of Cd(II).…”
Section: Ultrafiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SS, MS, F-value, p-value, etc.) has been presented in the literature concerning RSM [48]. In statistical view, F-value should be as high as possible, whereas, p-value must be as low as possible.…”
Section: Rs Model For Permeate Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods that have been used for heavy metal removal from aqueous systems include gravimetric processes based upon chemical precipitation and flocculation, solvent extraction, ion-exchange, ultrafiltration, and adsorption [17][18][19]. For analytical applications the traditional laboratory methods of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) have been the dominant methods.…”
Section: Extraction Of Heavy Metals Using Cntmentioning
confidence: 99%