Micellar Flooding and ASP-Chemical Methods for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Abstract

Chemical flooding methods hold particular attraction for recovering the "residual oil" left in the reservoir after waterflooding. This paper describes and compares the results for two promising methods, viz. micellar flooding and alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding processes. Both of these methods have been tested successfully in the field, notably micellar flooding. Laboratory results are described for micellar floods in consolidated sandstone cores as well as in unconsolidated sand packs, including a three-dimensional model, equipped with horizontal or vertical wells. Floods were also carried out in unconsolidated cores using combinations of an alkali, surfactant and a polymer. Individual slugs were injected sequentially in some of the experiments, while the three components were mixed and injected as a single slug in other experiments. Oil recoveries in the two cases were similar. Results for the two processes are compared and contrasted, showing that, on the basis of oil volume recovered per unit mass of the chemical used, the two processes are similar, with micellar flooding having an edge. However, on the basis of total oil recovery, micellar flooding is the superior process, with oil recoveries ranging from 50 to 80﹪ of the oil left in the porous medium after a waterflood. Practical implications of the results are discussed. Introduction Among chemical flooding methods, micellar flooding and alkaline- surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding processes are particularly effective for recovering a large fraction of the conventional oil (25 °CDATA[API, or higher) left in the reservoir after a waterflood, which could be as much as 60﹪ of the original oil in place. Many field tests of the micellar flooding process and several of ASP have established the effectiveness of these methods for mobilizing waterflood residual oil. The present laboratory study compares and contrasts the two processes, based on tertiary floods in sand packs and Berea sandstone cores. A number of investigators have noted the use of an alkali for reducing the divalent ion content and increasing the negative charge of the rock with a view to reducing chemical loss(1,2). Surkalo(3) reported the alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP) process as an alternative to micellar flooding. Several field tests have also been reported. Another function of alkali, if the Acid No. of the crude oil is large enough (> 0.5 mg KOH/g crude oil) is that the alkali may react with the acid components to form a surfactant in situ. Other factors, such as gravity segregation of alkali solutions, rate of diffusional and mechanical mixing, and subsequent mixing of surfactant formed would limit the effectiveness of this mechanism. The Process Chemical flooding methods are based on improving the mobility ratio, i.e., making the mobility of the displacing flood less than or equal to the mobility of the displaced fluid, and increasing the capillary number, mainly by making the interfacial tension (IFT) between the displacing and the displaced phases small, usually by about 1,000 fold. Other effects are also present, such as formation of macro- and microemulsions, formation of precipitates, wettability changes, relative permeability shifts, etc. Macroemulsions may improve the mobility ratio through drop entrainment and entrapment. At the same time, surfactant adsorption occurs on the rock surface.

Heavy-Oil Recovery by In-Situ Emulsion Formation

“…Previous research (Thomas and Ali 2001;Hirasaki et al 2008;Flaaten et al 2010) has shown that light-oil recovery can be improved by the application of AS flooding. This work focuses on the application of this technique for heavy oil (10,000 cp).…”

“…Alkalis can react with the acids present in crude oil to form in-situ soaps. The soap molecules also act as surfaceactive agents and hence can reduce the requirement of synthetic surfactants (Thomas and Ali 2001;Martin and Oxley 1985). Surfactants, whether synthetic or in the form of soap molecules made by alkali, reduce interfacial tension between water and oil.…”

Sweep Efficiency of Heavy Oil Recovery by Chemical Methods

“…Light oil recovery can be enhanced by the application of alkali-surfactant-polymer (ASP) flooding (Thomas and Ali 2001;Hirasaki et al 2008;Flaaten et al 2008). Surfactants are organic molecules having a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail.…”

“…Alkalis can react with the acids present in the crude oil to form in-situ soaps. The soap molecules also act as surface active agents and hence can reduce the requirement of synthetic surfactants (Thomas and Ali 2001;Martin and Oxley 1985). Surfactants, whether synthetic or soap molecules made by alkali, reduce interfacial tension between water and oil.…”

Emulsion Flooding of Heavy Oil

“…Alkalis can react with the acids present in the crude oil to form in-situ soaps. The soap molecules also act as surface active agents and hence can reduce the requirement of synthetic surfactants (Martin, 1985;Thomas, 2001;Hirasaki, 2008). Surfactants, whether synthetic or soap molecules made by alkali, reduce interfacial tension between water and oil.…”