2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137351029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Michel Foucault: A Research Companion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Foucault's texts, one may differentiate between three types of the dispositif of power: legal dispositif, i.e. the system of prohibitions and sanctions connected to sovereign power; disciplinary dispositif connected to disciplinary power, which forces individuals to behave according to a system of norms; and the dispositif of security, corresponding with the (neo) liberal governmentality (rationality of power), according to which individuals become both subjects and objects of power, and are supposed to discipline themselves, implementing in their lives optimal or at least average models of conducting themselves (Raffnsøe, Gudmand-Høyer, and Thaning 2011;. Dispositif analysis usually refers to the latter type, perceiving it as a tool of neoliberal power, promoting the model of a resourceful citizen, responsible for themselves and their role in society (Bührmann 2004).…”
Section: Dispositif Analysis: Its Sources and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Foucault's texts, one may differentiate between three types of the dispositif of power: legal dispositif, i.e. the system of prohibitions and sanctions connected to sovereign power; disciplinary dispositif connected to disciplinary power, which forces individuals to behave according to a system of norms; and the dispositif of security, corresponding with the (neo) liberal governmentality (rationality of power), according to which individuals become both subjects and objects of power, and are supposed to discipline themselves, implementing in their lives optimal or at least average models of conducting themselves (Raffnsøe, Gudmand-Høyer, and Thaning 2011;. Dispositif analysis usually refers to the latter type, perceiving it as a tool of neoliberal power, promoting the model of a resourceful citizen, responsible for themselves and their role in society (Bührmann 2004).…”
Section: Dispositif Analysis: Its Sources and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this ‘openness’ and flexibility toward various usages, intellectual historians argue, is one of the key characteristics that make such concepts and vocabularies shared, foundational, and influential (Gallie, 1956; Koselleck, 2011; Skinner, 1989). In his later work, Michel Foucault (1997, 2001, 2007a) proposed the analytical category ‘problematization’ to describe this process (see also Borch, 2012; Castel, 1994; Lopdrup-Hjorth, 2013; Raffnsøe et al, 2016). He loosely characterized a problematization as a combination of the way in which something is made into a problem (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical and Analytical Approach Taken In Diagnosing The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeg transskriberede selv alle interviews og analyserede dem med udgangspunkt i en analysemodel, jeg og en kollega har udviklet med afsaet i den franske filosof og sociolog Michel Foucaults problematiseringsanalyse (Foucault, 1985). Problematiseringsanalyse handler om at belyse måden, hvorpå noget (for eksempel en bestemt type adfaerd, visse faenomener eller processer) optraeder som et problem, og hvordan det overhovedet er blevet til et problem -ofte på forskellige måder inden for forskellige diskurser (Raffnsøe et al, 2015). (For en uddybning af analysemodellen se Pedersen og Krarup, 2018).…”
Section: Metodeunclassified