Institutions of Confinement 1997
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139052535.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Michel Foucault's Impact on the German Historiography of Criminal Justice, Social Discipline, and Medicalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Es verhält sich insgesamt ähnlich wie bei Foucaults Studie zur Geburt des Gefängnisses. Die historische Zunft hat inzwischen empirisch alles auf den Prüfstein gelegt und zerpflückt, der Stachel der Historizität bleibt jedoch (Dinges 1996). Kaum jemand wird heute mehr mit überzeitlichen Kategorien an die Geschichte der Strafregime herangehen.…”
Section: Zur Historizität Von Raum Und Geschlechtunclassified
“…Es verhält sich insgesamt ähnlich wie bei Foucaults Studie zur Geburt des Gefängnisses. Die historische Zunft hat inzwischen empirisch alles auf den Prüfstein gelegt und zerpflückt, der Stachel der Historizität bleibt jedoch (Dinges 1996). Kaum jemand wird heute mehr mit überzeitlichen Kategorien an die Geschichte der Strafregime herangehen.…”
Section: Zur Historizität Von Raum Und Geschlechtunclassified
“…Two key participants in this operation were Luis Stamponi, an Argentine activist who had joined the ELN-B in the late 1960s, and the Uruguayan Enrique Lucas, a former MLN-T member who had joined the ELN-B during his stay in Argentina in the framework of JCR activities. 49 These plans did not withstand the 1976 coup in Argentina, with the ensuing assassination of Torres in Argentina, and the disappearance of Stamponi and Lucas in Bolivia during joint operations staged by the dictatorships of the Southern Cone.…”
Section: Histoire Politique 34 | 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problematic, in my view, is Dinges's consistent labeling of Foucault's critics as people led by a belief in progress. Because the French philosopher ''criticized the Enlightenment'' with his emphasis on the rise of a disciplinarian society, his opponents must necessarily be prophets of rationalization and modernity (Dinges 1996: 159 on power; 161-62, 170-71, on progress). This argument inappropriately reduces a scholarly debate to a political and ideological clash of views.…”
Section: Foucault and Historians Of Crime And Justicementioning
confidence: 99%