2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-019-00063-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-affirmations and Recovery for Persons with Mental Health and Alcohol and Drug Problems: User and Professional Experience-Based Practice and Knowledge

Abstract: Recurrent factors contributing to a recovery process from co-occurring mental health and addiction problems mentioned by users and professionals have been analyzed as part of working alliances and helpful relationships. Still, we lack knowledge about how helpful relationships are developed in daily practice. In this article, we focus on the concrete construction of professional helpful relationships. Forty persons in recovery and fifteen professionals were interviewed. The interviews were analyzed according to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several qualitative studies presented similar findings, with clients valuing the quality of therapeutic relationships in achieving recovery, and preferring empathetic providers who view them as whole people (Haskell et al, 2016;McCallum et al, 2016;Motta-Ochoa et al, 2017;Stott & Priest, 2018;Topor et al, 2019). To strengthen the therapeutic relationship, three literature reviews and two qualitative studies among clients and providers of comorbidity services noted the need to flexibly balance validating and challenging the client (Donald et al, 2019;Kendall et al, 2011;Lubman et al, 2011), and ensuring that contact is consistent and continues throughout the referral process (Hoxmark & Wynn, 2010;Staiger et al, 2011).…”
Section: Build a Strong Therapeutic Relationship (N = 24)mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Several qualitative studies presented similar findings, with clients valuing the quality of therapeutic relationships in achieving recovery, and preferring empathetic providers who view them as whole people (Haskell et al, 2016;McCallum et al, 2016;Motta-Ochoa et al, 2017;Stott & Priest, 2018;Topor et al, 2019). To strengthen the therapeutic relationship, three literature reviews and two qualitative studies among clients and providers of comorbidity services noted the need to flexibly balance validating and challenging the client (Donald et al, 2019;Kendall et al, 2011;Lubman et al, 2011), and ensuring that contact is consistent and continues throughout the referral process (Hoxmark & Wynn, 2010;Staiger et al, 2011).…”
Section: Build a Strong Therapeutic Relationship (N = 24)mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A humanising ethos of care informed by each client’s unique social positionality, biography, strengths and aspirations is imperative in supporting clients’ long-term recovery and resettlement journeys ( Phipps et al, 2017 ; Todres et al, 2009 ; Topor et al, 2021 ). For instance, providers should be cognizant of how the multiplicity of biographical and structural forms of disadvantage may give rise to existential uncertainty, apathy and hopelessness, which could be mislabelled as service resistance or non-compliance ( Padgett et al, 2016 ; Phipps et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%