1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf03223363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro- and macrostructural factors in DRA fracture resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown by Davidson [5][6][7] using a stereo-imaging technique to visualise crack-tip strain fields, and was later qualitatively corroborated by Flom and Arsenault [8]. Other fracture data confirm that a significant plastic zone is formed: K Ic values exceeding 20 MPa m 1=2 have indeed been reported in various studies or reviews [3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. According to elementary fracture mechanics, such toughness values must be associated with significant crack-tip plastic deformation given the moderate yield stress of these materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This was shown by Davidson [5][6][7] using a stereo-imaging technique to visualise crack-tip strain fields, and was later qualitatively corroborated by Flom and Arsenault [8]. Other fracture data confirm that a significant plastic zone is formed: K Ic values exceeding 20 MPa m 1=2 have indeed been reported in various studies or reviews [3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. According to elementary fracture mechanics, such toughness values must be associated with significant crack-tip plastic deformation given the moderate yield stress of these materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In what follows, the composites will be designated as follows: the first letter indicates the chemistry of the particles (A for Al 2 O 3 and B for B 4 C), the following number determines the average reinforcement size measured by centrifugal sedimentation. 1 For Al 2 O 3 composites a letter is finally added to differentiate between angular (a) or polygonal (p) particles.…”
Section: Materials Processing and Designationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand why, the influence of main microstructural variables such as the type and size of the reinforcement, or the composition and heattreatment of the matrix, have been widely examined; several reviews devoted to the fracture of PRMMCs provide an overview of this large body of information [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such embrittling phases can form at various stages of composite processing: by reaction between the matrix and the reinforcement, during solidification, or during heat-treatment. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Even small quantities of brittle second phases, particularly if these are located along the matrix/reinforcement interface, are well-documented to affect the toughness and tensile ductility of metal matrix composites, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] particularly when they exceed a relatively small critical thickness. [20][21][22][23][24] A second factor in matrix selection is the need for strong interfacial bonding, this being especially important in particulate composites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%