2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: Relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function

Abstract: Non-invasive characterization of fracture callus structure and composition may facilitate development of surrogate measures of the regain of mechanical function. As such, quantitative computed tomography- (CT-) based analyses of fracture calluses could enable more reliable clinical assessments of bone healing. Although previous studies have used CT to quantify and predict fracture healing, it is unclear which of the many CT-derived metrics of callus structure and composition are the most predictive of callus m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
224
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
224
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our data, it is now possible to make a realistic estimate of the sample size needed for further studies. We estimate 16 to 17 mice/ group/time point would be an appropriate sample size to detect a 60% difference in mean BV/TV with a power of 0.8, which is consistent with sample sizes needed in some other bone repair models such as fracture [44]. Even though we found a difference of approximately 60% with a smaller sample size in our study, a post hoc analysis indicates the power of the experiment was on the order of 0.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on our data, it is now possible to make a realistic estimate of the sample size needed for further studies. We estimate 16 to 17 mice/ group/time point would be an appropriate sample size to detect a 60% difference in mean BV/TV with a power of 0.8, which is consistent with sample sizes needed in some other bone repair models such as fracture [44]. Even though we found a difference of approximately 60% with a smaller sample size in our study, a post hoc analysis indicates the power of the experiment was on the order of 0.5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The sample size utilized in this study is based on and consistent with sample sizes used in other bone repair models [44]. After the conclusion of this study, power analyses were performed for assessing one of the key outcomes in Experiment 3, bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), assuming a power of 0.8, with alpha = 0.05, and expecting a 60% difference between groups (Power and Sample Size Calculations 3.0.43; http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/Power SampleSize).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the subchondral sclerotic bone changes at the pressure areas of the cage wall with the endplates, different stages of the bone fusion process were shown in the periphery of the cage: bone apposition adjacent to the endplates, appearance of hazy densities indicating matrix calcification/mineralization, and finally formation of trabecular bone within the disc space. Appreciation of the amount and width of these changes was possible with this cross-sectional technique, not demonstrated before with radiography nor with classical CT. With regard to predicting ACIF outcomes, CBCT may demonstrate the amount of bone mineralization is visible, as there are the hazy densities visible before a stable bone bridge is formed [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly formed fracture callus tissue was spatially segmented from the native cortical bone in the 2D tomograms. (20,21) Briefly, the outside of the callus was manually delineated and refined through an automated intensity matching procedure to contour the outer boundary. The periosteal surface of the native cortical bone was manually delineated to define the callus and cortical boundaries, thus isolating the callus volume of interest (Supporting Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fracture Callus Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these calculations, both TV and BV were normalized by the length of the callus. (20) Histological, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative PCR assessments of the callus tissue were performed as described. (9,10,22) (Details are available in the Supporting Information-Methods and Supporting Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fracture Callus Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%