2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro CT analysis of the subarticular bone structure in the area of the talar trochlea

Abstract: PurposeCertain regions of the talar trochlea are recognized as exhibiting varying cartilage thickness and degrees of subchondral bone mineralization. These changes have been attributed to the long-term loading history. For the current study, we accepted the hypothesis that stress-induced alterations of the joint surface include not only varying degrees of subchondral lamellar mineralization, but also structural changes of the subarticular cancellous bone.MethodsIn order to examine the structure of the subartic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analyses have assessed the functional significance of trabecular and cortical bone structure of the ankle in humans (talus: Athavale, Joshi, & Joshi, ; Ebraheim, Sabry, & Nadim, ; Nowakowski, Deyhle, Zander, Leumann, & Müller‐Gerbl, ; Pal & Routal, ; Schiff et al, ; Sinha, ; Takechi, Ito, Takada, & Nakayama, ; talus and distal tibia: Hvid, Rasmussen, Jensen, & Nielsen, ), and several studies have adopted a comparative approach across different taxa (talus: DeSilva & Devlin, ; Hérbert, Lebrun, & Marivaux, ; Su, ; Su & Carlson, ; Su, Wallace, & Nakatsukasa, ; tibia: Barak, Lieberman, Raichlen et al, 2013; Carlson, Chirchir, & Patel, ; Su, ). DeSilva and Devlin () found interspecific differences in regional patterning of trabecular structure across four quadrants of the talar body but were unable to attribute these differences to locomotor mode and a biomechanical explanation remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analyses have assessed the functional significance of trabecular and cortical bone structure of the ankle in humans (talus: Athavale, Joshi, & Joshi, ; Ebraheim, Sabry, & Nadim, ; Nowakowski, Deyhle, Zander, Leumann, & Müller‐Gerbl, ; Pal & Routal, ; Schiff et al, ; Sinha, ; Takechi, Ito, Takada, & Nakayama, ; talus and distal tibia: Hvid, Rasmussen, Jensen, & Nielsen, ), and several studies have adopted a comparative approach across different taxa (talus: DeSilva & Devlin, ; Hérbert, Lebrun, & Marivaux, ; Su, ; Su & Carlson, ; Su, Wallace, & Nakatsukasa, ; tibia: Barak, Lieberman, Raichlen et al, 2013; Carlson, Chirchir, & Patel, ; Su, ). DeSilva and Devlin () found interspecific differences in regional patterning of trabecular structure across four quadrants of the talar body but were unable to attribute these differences to locomotor mode and a biomechanical explanation remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now it is possible to determine the microarchitecture of trabecular bone in a direct manner, saving the time consuming sectioning process and the inaccuracy of assumptions . In addition to the common differences in trabecular architecture as function of anatomic position, loading direction, and load accumulation over time, precise correlations to individual long‐term load intake are described …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%