2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72718-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, comparisons of CT values between clinical and microCT systems is complicated by differences in X‐ray beam geometries (Siewerdsen & Jaffray, ; Kalender, ; Katsumata et al. ; Kachelrieß, ; Mah et al. ; Chindasombatjaroen et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, comparisons of CT values between clinical and microCT systems is complicated by differences in X‐ray beam geometries (Siewerdsen & Jaffray, ; Kalender, ; Katsumata et al. ; Kachelrieß, ; Mah et al. ; Chindasombatjaroen et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT values must be calibrated to identify specific tissues, but universal usage of CT values as a contrast measurement index is complicated by the fact that values vary with sample size (Siegel et al 2004), voltage (Nakayama et al 2005;Miles et al 2007), and between CT systems (Miles et al 2007). Furthermore, comparisons of CT values between clinical and microCT systems is complicated by differences in X-ray beam geometries (Siewerdsen & Jaffray, 2001;Kalender, 2005;Katsumata et al 2007;Kachelrieß, 2008;Mah et al 2010;Chindasombatjaroen et al 2011). An attempt has been made to provide an alternative standard value, called a K factor, which is the slope of the linear relationship between the CT values and iodine concentration, in order to overcome these factors with iodine-based staining methods (Garrett et al 1985;Miles et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the imaging is quite prone to artifacts, which may cause image aliasing and affect the quality [ 67 ]. Besides, the ultrahigh resolution of micro-CT is usually accompanied by a radiation dose up to 1500 mGy, which significantly exceeds the clinical CT reference range of 1 to 70 mGy [ 68 ]. Thereby, if micro-CT was applied in the clinical diagnosis, the clinician should carefully balance the contradiction between the imaging resolution and radiation exposure.…”
Section: Imaging Modalities In the Diagnosis Of Cracked Toothmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of artefact can be minimised by using higher beam intensities (increased mAs) which result in better signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (Boas & Fleischmann 2012;Sutton et al 2014). Furthermore, an increased source voltage (Kachelrieß 2008;Hsieh 2009;Boas & Fleischmann 2012) and an augmented number of projection images (Sutton et al 2014) may reduce noise. Low exposure times can result in high noise, so increased exposure times and the use of filters may reduce these artefacts in dense samples (Sutton et al 2014).…”
Section: Ring Artefactsmentioning
confidence: 99%