2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-dosimetry calculation of Auger-electron-emitting radionuclides mostly used in nuclear medicine using GEANT4-DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent biodistribution studies with [ 123 I]MAPi in healthy athymic nude mice reported the estimated absorbed dose in liver and thyroid as 0.0044 Gy/MBq and 0.0041 Gy/MBq respectively, although the intracellular distribution of [ 123 I]MAPi was not taken into consideration [ 14 ]. The MIRD S-value for 125 I in a cell nucleus to nucleus was reported to be 6.60 × 10 −3 Gy/(Bq-s) [ 31 ]. Goddu et al ., reported a wide range of S-value for nucleus to nucleus radiation from 125 I ranging from 3.42 × 10 −1 Gy/(Bq-s) to 9.52 × 10 −4 Gy/(Bq-s), assuming a homogeneous distribution of 125 I in the nucleus with varying nucleus diameters [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent biodistribution studies with [ 123 I]MAPi in healthy athymic nude mice reported the estimated absorbed dose in liver and thyroid as 0.0044 Gy/MBq and 0.0041 Gy/MBq respectively, although the intracellular distribution of [ 123 I]MAPi was not taken into consideration [ 14 ]. The MIRD S-value for 125 I in a cell nucleus to nucleus was reported to be 6.60 × 10 −3 Gy/(Bq-s) [ 31 ]. Goddu et al ., reported a wide range of S-value for nucleus to nucleus radiation from 125 I ranging from 3.42 × 10 −1 Gy/(Bq-s) to 9.52 × 10 −4 Gy/(Bq-s), assuming a homogeneous distribution of 125 I in the nucleus with varying nucleus diameters [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moradi et al have reported the highest difference in the S-value between various radionuclides when radioactive source was localized in the nucleus, and there was not considerable difference in the nucleus dose when radionuclides were localized in cytoplasm and over the cell membrane. [ 19 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most previous studies about cellular dosimetry, the effect of the nucleus size has been assessed employing the most commonly electron emitter radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine which contain electrons with different energies and weighting factors and simulation codes. [ 18 19 20 ] However, the effect of electron energy has not been specifically addressed. In other words, the effect of the energy will not specially be provided by applying the electron emitter radionuclides with wide energy spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicellular dosimetry is also important for organs and tissue with microstructure (Sgouros et al, 2011). Several studies were performed for calculating the cellular S-coefficients based on analytical and Monte Carlo methods (Bousis et al, 2010;Chegeni et al, 2021;Di Maria et al, 2018;Fourie et al, 2015;Goddu et al, 1994a;Falzone et al, 2017;Ftáčniková and Böhm, 2000;Kouhkan et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2018;Moradi and Bidabadi, 2018;Salim and Taherparvar, 2020;Šefl et al, 2015;Siragusa et al, 2017;Tajik-Mansoury et al, 2017;Tang et al, 2021;Tung et al, 2004;Wu et al, 2012). For example, Goddu et al (1994a) evaluated the cellular S-coefficients for various α, β, and Auger electron emitters for the target←source combinations of cell←cell, cell←cell surface, nucleus←nucleus, nucleus←cytoplasm, and nucleus←cell surface.…”
Section: Radiopharmaceutical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%