The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro/Meso/Macrolevels of Analysis

Abstract: Understanding the interplay between micro‐, meso‐, and macrolevels of analysis is a fundamental problematic of organizational communication scholarship. These terms are typically used to locate the researchers' analytical focus (e.g., on individuals, teams, organizations) relative to superordinate contextual phenomena and subordinate compositional phenomena. A simultaneous focus on multiple levels of analysis or on the influence of one on another has important conceptual and methodological implications. Organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other challenges to internal listening include the possibility that “those charged with these tasks may submerge or discount much of what is heard” (Lewis, 2020, p. 51). Additionally, variations in an organization's situation, including sudden changes such as those caused by the recent pandemic, could complicate listening and even result in listening failure (Barbour, 2017; Lewis, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other challenges to internal listening include the possibility that “those charged with these tasks may submerge or discount much of what is heard” (Lewis, 2020, p. 51). Additionally, variations in an organization's situation, including sudden changes such as those caused by the recent pandemic, could complicate listening and even result in listening failure (Barbour, 2017; Lewis, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listening has been associated with a broad array of beneficial organizational outcomes such as effective teamwork, a supportive organizational climate and stronger employee commitment and identification with the organization. Poor listening, on the other hand, has been associated with negative outcomes, such as counterproductive conflict and organizational mishaps like medical errors, misunderstood work orders, feedback confusion and reduced workplace safety (Barbour, 2017; Lewis, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this study employs a multilevel framework consisting of micro-, meso-and macro-levels of analysis. Macro-level refers to the context in which the firm operates (Barbour, 2017), and the context includes economic, social, cultural, political, legal and environmental factors (David and David, 2016;Frynas and Yamahaki, 2016). Micro-level phenomena are typically those that occur within organizations, and organizational members play an important role at this level (Jones et al, 2004;Frynas and Yamahaki, 2016).…”
Section: Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals are the primary focus or unit of analysis at the micro-level. Meso-level analysis emphasizes the interaction between the organization and other stakeholders (Barbour, 2017). According to Clarkson (1995), stakeholders may include various groups, including customers, employees, shareholders, creditors, government, media, local communities and charity organizations.…”
Section: Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With customers, listening aims at a satisfaction of the underlying needs and the construction of relationships between the company and the consumer (Barbour, 2017). And this is what is evidenced in all the companies studied, which is captured in the following quote from one of them in its annual report:“We also seek to have direct, agile and expeditious communication channels with our customers, so that there is continuous feedback and efficiency in responding to their requirements” (Falabella, 2017, p. 3).…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%