2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-particles in ITER: A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stratified co-deposits split into 20-30 nm thin strata that easily disintegrate into very fine matter. As already discussed in previous papers [22], accumulation of water vapor in porous dust pieces and deposits causes splitting and flaking of the layers. The effect is enhanced when the layer is again subjected to vacuum conditions either in the SEM chamber or in a tokamak after a shut down period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stratified co-deposits split into 20-30 nm thin strata that easily disintegrate into very fine matter. As already discussed in previous papers [22], accumulation of water vapor in porous dust pieces and deposits causes splitting and flaking of the layers. The effect is enhanced when the layer is again subjected to vacuum conditions either in the SEM chamber or in a tokamak after a shut down period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…installation of tiles. More exact numbers cannot be given because the ultra-fine dust could not be weighed: (a) it sticks to the filtering paper; (b) some fine matter could not be removed from PFC because of strong adhesion to the substrate, probably due to Van der Waals forces as suggested in [22]. After subtracting the mass of above-mentioned larger debris and ceramics the amount of carbon matter is 0.1-0.2 g. The other side of the equation for the conversion factor includes the amount of material eroded and re-deposited on PFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known, however, that PMI can also create mobilizable solid particulates or dust (from current carbon-based tokamaks, the dust production rate relative to gross erosion is estimated around 10-15% [5]), whose role in affecting the required local balance between erosion and redeposition is particularly important for a solid tungsten PFC. This is a far greater challenge, as impurity neutrals can be ionized near the wall and hence promptly sent back to the wall, but solid dust particles can traverse long distances in the plasma chamber [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, due to high internal stresses, the redeposited layers can break, forming small and large size dusts. Dust occurrence represents a continuing concern in the scientific community for the thermonuclear facilities, because it raises the risk of contamination, both for the fusion facility and for the operators [2][3][4][5]. These contaminations come from the capacity of the dust material to incorporate tritium, due to their large specific surface area (SSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%