Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials

Cekic‐Nagas, Isil; Ergün, Gülfem; Eğilmez, Ferhan; Vallittu, Pekka K.; Lassila, Lippo

doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003

Cited by 113 publications

(119 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

108

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The application of HF acid partially dissolves the glass phase and provides undercuts in the micrometer scale for better micromechanical interlocking with a composite cement. However, the recently published working instruction of the International Academy for Adhesive Dentistry (IAAD) confirms the finding of the other laboratory studies and recommends pretreatment via HF acid etching and application of a silane [41,42] The silica-based ceramic part of the hybrid ceramic seems to determine the best choice of surface pretreatment [43].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 61%

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Al-shibri¹,

Elguindy²

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained crowns on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars made of different ceramics materials. Materials and Methods:Thirty sound maxillary premolars were endodontically treated. They were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n=10), in which, teeth were prepared to receive all-ceramic restorations. GP: fiber post and resin core and ferrule with all-ceramic (IPS E-max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent) conventional crown. GE: Endocrown with butt joint finish line design made of (IPS E-max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent). GC: Endocrown with butt joint finish line design made of hybrid nanoceramic (CERASMART, GC Dental, USA). The lithium disilicate (IPS E-max press, Ivoclar-Vivadent) and hybrid nanoceramic (CERASMART, GC Dental, USA) all-ceramic restorations were made by CAD/CAM system (CEREC MC XL SW 4.0) and adhesively cemented with dual-cure resin cement (BisCem Bisco, Inc, USA). Specimens were mounted in a universal testing machine (Model 3345; Instron Industrial Products, Norwood, MA, USA). Each specimen was loaded to failure at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm / min. Mode of failure was also examined. Data were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc significance difference tests. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Results:One way ANOVA test showed that group (GC) recorded statistically significant (p<0.05) highest mean value (1522.64 N) followed by group (GP) (1301.34 N) then group (GE) (725.73 N). Group (GE) recorded the lowest statistically significant (p<0.05) mean value (725.73±137.89 N). Pair-wise Tukey's post-hoc test showed nonsignificant (P>0.05) difference between GP and GC groups. Conclusions:Within the limitations of this study, all fracture resistance loads obtained in this study were far beyond the maximum masticatory forces and the presence of hybrid nanoceramic increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrown than those restored with lithium disilicate endocrowns, in failure mode hybrid nanoceramic showed favorable fracture pattern than lithium disilicate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 61%

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Al-shibri¹,

Elguindy²

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, universal bonding material was used as a primer because it contains various functional components, such as 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) or silane, in addition to the components present in the previously widely used primer. Moreover, a previous study of the bonding of hybrid ceramic found that the bonding strength was higher when the adhesive solution contained MDP than when it contained only silane 16) . Additionally, it was considered that silane could be helpful in bonding because hybrid ceramic also contains silica filler.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Effect of air-particle pressures on the surface topography and bond strengths of resin cement to the hybrid ceramics

Kim

Shim

et al. 2017

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the appropriate pressure for airborne-abrasion by comparing the shear bond strength values for different hybrid ceramic surfaces. Two materials were used to produce hybrid ceramic specimens: Lava Ultimate and MAZIC Duro. The group of specimens whose surfaces were not subjected to airborne-abrasion was set as the control group. In the experimental group, airborne-abrasion was performed at pressures of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 MPa. After the adhesive and resin cement was applied, an SBS test was performed. For the MAZIC Duro block, the SBS increased monotonically with the airborne-abrasion pressure increased, peaking at 0.3 MPa. For the Lava Ultimate block, the SBS increased as the airborne-abrasion pressure increased to 0.2 MPa, and then decreased in the 0.3-MPa group, thereby peaking at 0.2 MPa. This study has confirmed that the bonding strength varies with the material used even when applying the same surface treatment.

show abstract

“…Cekic‐Nagas et al evaluated the effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on the micro‐shear bond strength of 3 resin cements to 3 different hybrid materials. 1.5‐mm thickness samples of PICN (Vita Enamic), nano‐ceramic resin (Lava Ultimate) and nano‐ceramic (Cerasmart) were divided into 2 groups, according to the surface treatment: wet‐ground with silicon carbide abrasive papers or etching with hydrofluoric acid.…”

Section: Mechanical and Adhesive Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A literature review on the new polymer‐infiltrated ceramic‐network material (PICN)

Facenda

Borba

Corazza

2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials

Abstract: Use of appropriate resin cement systems with different ceramic/glass-polymer materials might promote the bonding capacity of these systems.

Cited by 113 publications

References 26 publications

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Effect of air-particle pressures on the surface topography and bond strengths of resin cement to the hybrid ceramics

A literature review on the new polymer‐infiltrated ceramic‐network material (PICN)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About