Microaggressions towards people affected by mental health problems: a scoping review

Abstract

Aims This review aims to understand the scope of the literature regarding mental health-related microaggressions towards people affected by mental health problems. Methods A scoping review was conducted to explore this question. Four electronic health-oriented databases were searched alongside Google Scholar. As per scoping review principles, the inclusion criteria were developed iteratively. The results of included studies were synthesised using a basic narrative synthesis approach, utilising principles of thematic analysis and thematic synthesis where appropriate. Results A total of 1196 records were identified, of which 17 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 were peer-reviewed journal articles, three were research degree theses and two were book chapters. Six included empirical studies were qualitative, four were quantitative and two employed a mixed-methods design. Within these, five qualitative studies aimed to describe the nature of mental health microaggressions experienced by people with mental health problems. Themes identified in a thematic synthesis of these five studies included stereotypes about mental illness, invalidating peoples' experience and blaming people with mental illness for their condition. The included publications informed on the perpetration of mental health microaggressions by family, friends, health professionals and social workers. In addition, two studies created scales, which were then used in cross-sectional surveys of the general public and community members to assess characteristics, such as right-wing political views, associated with endorsement of mental health microaggressions. A consensus definition of microaggressions emerged from the included studies: microaggressions are brief, everyday slights, snubs or insults, that may be subtle or ambiguous, but communicate a negative message to a target person based on their membership of a marginalised group, in this case, people affected by mental illness. Conclusions The study of mental health microaggressions is an emerging, heterogeneous field, embedded in the wider stigma and discrimination literature. It has been influenced by earlier work on racial microaggressions. Both can be ambiguous and contradictory, which creates difficulty defining the boundaries of the concept, but also underpins the key theoretical basis for the negative impact of microaggressions. Mental illness is a more concealable potential type of identity, so it follows that the reported perpetrators of microaggressions are largely friends, family and professionals. This has implications for intervening to reduce the impact of microaggressions. There are several challenges facing research in this area, and further work is needed to understand the impact of mental health microaggressions on people affected by mental health problems.

“It’s Not in Your Head”: Gaslighting, ‘Splaining, Victim Blaming, and Other Harmful Reactions to Microaggressions

“…The target is first presented with attributional ambiguity (e.g., questioning if the microaggression resulted from race, gender, both, or some other combination of one’s identity groups). Despite the cognitive and emotional energy expended by targets in identifying microaggressions (Pitcan et al, 2018), studies suggest that marginalized individuals regularly experience and identify microaggressions; more than 90% of most study samples report having experienced microaggressions on a regular basis (Barber et al, 2020; Woodford et al, 2014). Therefore, if targets can overcome this ambiguity and identify the microaggression, they are left to either sit and ruminate on the matter or confront the person.…”

Microaggressions and Psychosocial Adjustment among Greek University Students with Disabilities

“…These hostile indignities may intentionally or unintentionally target a certain person or group [21]. In the 1970s, the term microaggression was used to describe tactful insulting behaviors towards Black Americans [23], and it remains a "discreet" form of contemporary racism towards marginalized social groups, such as women, people with different ethnic backgrounds, people with impairments and/or mental health conditions, and those with different sexual orientations [21].…”

Promotion, prevention and treatment interventions for mental health in low- and middle-income countries through a task-shifting approach

“…Major barriers to closing the treatment gap are the huge persistent scarcity of skilled human resources, large inequities and inefficiencies in resource distribution and utilisation, limited community awareness of mental health, poverty and social deprivation, and the significant stigma associated with psychiatric illness (Barber et al ., 2019). Some papers have advocated for scaling up evidence-based services and for the task-shifting of mental health interventions to non-specialists as key strategies for closing the treatment gap (Patel et al ., 2018).…”