2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11157-020-09528-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microalgae harvesting by fungal-assisted bioflocculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When P. ostreatus was added to E. gracilis at four different ratios, fungal dose and harvesting efficiency were positively correlated aligning with earlier findings (Li et al 2020;Nazari et al 2020). Harvesting efficiency at the lowest fungal ratio was 10-13% lower than for the other ratios which had similar removal rates, suggesting a minimum fungal inoculum concentration threshold for optimal microalgal harvesting.…”
Section: Harvesting Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When P. ostreatus was added to E. gracilis at four different ratios, fungal dose and harvesting efficiency were positively correlated aligning with earlier findings (Li et al 2020;Nazari et al 2020). Harvesting efficiency at the lowest fungal ratio was 10-13% lower than for the other ratios which had similar removal rates, suggesting a minimum fungal inoculum concentration threshold for optimal microalgal harvesting.…”
Section: Harvesting Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The smallest (8-25 µm), non-motile, microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Scenedesmus quadricauda) had the highest flocculation rates (up to ~ 90% in 24 h) while the largest (150-300 µm), non-motile, microalgae (Pyrocystis lunula) had the lowest flocculation rate (up to ~ 40% in 24 h). The results from our study suggest that large motile microalgae may not be harvested by fungal bioflocculation, either as filaments or pellets, as efficiently as smaller non-motile species (Ummalyma et al 2017;Nazari et al 2020). In a method similar to ours, Talukder et al (2014) applied exogenous fungal filaments to immobilize C. vulgaris and Nannochloropsis spp., which are small (≤ 10 µm) non-motile algae.…”
Section: Harvesting Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Harvesting by centrifugation or filtering leads to higher efficiency, but these methods are not suitable for continuous culture (Shelef et al, 1984;Najjar and Abu-Shamleh, 2020). Continuous culture and sediment harvesting can reduce the time and cost associated with bioresource production (Park et al, 2011(Park et al, , 2015Nazari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%