“…Besides gross‐morphological changes affecting the skeleton, the microstructure (i.e., inner structure) of skeletal elements is also affected due to changing requirements in locomotion and buoyancy. Bone microanatomy, that is, the amount and distribution of the osseous tissue in the bone, is strongly associated with lifestyle and bone biomechanics (e.g., Canoville and Laurin, ; Canoville and Laurin, ; Houssaye et al, ; Dumont et al, ; Quémeneur et al, ; Houssaye et al, ; Canoville et al, ) and can thus indicate ecological preferences (e.g., de Buffrénil et al, , de Buffrénil and Mazin, , Laurin et al, , Germain and Laurin, , Laurin et al, , Laurin et al, , Houssaye et al, , Houssaye et al, ). Further on, changes of microanatomical patterns during the evolutionary history of a clade can document processes of secondary aquatic adaptations (e.g., de Buffrénil et al, ; Amson et al, ; Houssaye et al, ).…”