2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma

Abstract: Background: RNA amplification is necessary for profiling gene expression from small tissue samples. Previous studies have shown that the T7 based amplification techniques are reproducible but may distort the true abundance of targets. However, the consequences of such distortions on the ability to detect biological variation in expression have not been explored sufficiently to define the true extent of usability and limitations of such amplification techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
414
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
414
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, limma package [15] in R (V.3.0.1) [16] was used to identify the DEGs between I/R group and control group in the two rat strains. Bayes testing [17] was applied to perform the multiple correction, and p values < 0.05 and |log fold change (FC)| > 1.0 were set as the threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, limma package [15] in R (V.3.0.1) [16] was used to identify the DEGs between I/R group and control group in the two rat strains. Bayes testing [17] was applied to perform the multiple correction, and p values < 0.05 and |log fold change (FC)| > 1.0 were set as the threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes that are differentially expressed between populations were detected with the limma package (Diboun et al 2006). Detailed information on data retrieval and analysis are fully described in the Supplemental Material.…”
Section: Population Differentiation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,16] In the significance analysis, P value was adjusted as false discovery rate (FDR) by Benjamini and Hochberg method. [17] Only the miRNAs met with the criteria of |log 2 fold change (FC)| > 1 and FDR < 0.05 were defined as DEmiRNAs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%