2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-5-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray and EST database estimates of mRNA expression levels differ: The protein length versus expression curve for C. elegans

Abstract: Background: Various methods for estimating protein expression levels are known. The level of correlation between these methods is only fair, and systematic biases in each of the methods cannot be ruled out. We here investigate systematic biases in the estimation of gene expression rates from microarray data and from abundance within the Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) database. We suggest that length is a significant factor in biases to measured gene expression rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency for EST libraries to be biased towards longer transcripts has been previously reported [9]. These studies suggest that the direct use of EST data might be problematic and that it should be normalized for length if transcript abundance is to be used as a measure of expression levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The tendency for EST libraries to be biased towards longer transcripts has been previously reported [9]. These studies suggest that the direct use of EST data might be problematic and that it should be normalized for length if transcript abundance is to be used as a measure of expression levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…22,49,50 ESTs constitute partial transcriptome representation correlated with gene abundance and expression. 51,52 In 14 Citrus species ( C. aurantifolia ; C. aurantium ; C. clementina ; C. jambhiri ; C. limettioides ; C. limonia ; C. medica ; C. reshni ; C. reticulata ; C. reticulata × C. temple ; C. sinensis × P. trifoliata ; C. unshiu ; C. paradisi ; C. paradisi × P. trifoliata ) and P. trifoliata , we extracted the expression of ESTs count using the CAP3 assembly (.ace files) and compared the usage of codons in accordance with earlier reports. 5355 We also selected the ribosomal protein-encoding genes and quantified the association of the ribosomal encoding genes with axis 1 (COA/RSCU) and axis 2 (COA/RSCU) of correspondence analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representation in cDNA library generally correlates with abundance in the original biologic sample [59] although artifacts occur [60,61]. To investigate the difference in the codon usage patterns in highly abundant transcripts as compared with less abundantly expressed genes, as determined by ESTs, we selected five species, each of which is a member of a different clade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%