2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-002-0905-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarray profiling of skeletal muscle tissues from equally obese, non-diabetic insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant Pima Indians

Abstract: Aims/hypothesis. We carried out global transcript profiling to identify differentially expressed skeletal muscle genes in insulin resistance, a major risk factor for Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. This approach also complemented the ongoing genomic linkage analyses to identify genes linked to insulin resistance and diabetes in Pima Indians. Methods. We compared gene expression profiles of skeletal muscle tissues from 18 insulin-sensitive versus 17 insulin-resistant equally obese, non-diabet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dataset IR_Hs originally reports that the differentially expressed genes in insulin resistance of skeletal muscle cells are susceptible genes for T2D [34]. The datasets Preadipocyte_Hs and Adipocyte_Hs describes obesity induced inflammatory response in preadipocytes and adipocytes cells [35], [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dataset IR_Hs originally reports that the differentially expressed genes in insulin resistance of skeletal muscle cells are susceptible genes for T2D [34]. The datasets Preadipocyte_Hs and Adipocyte_Hs describes obesity induced inflammatory response in preadipocytes and adipocytes cells [35], [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, microarray profiling of insulin-sensitive versus insulin-resistant tissues typically detects expression pattern changes in hundreds of genes [4-6]. Current electronic resources do not allow the list of differentially expressed genes to be automatically cross-checked against well described pathways.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When corrected for the large multiple-testing penalty, essentially no genes emerged as differentially expressed between the experimental groups (139, 170). Mootha et al approached this problem with a dimension-reduction approach to the data analysis (98).…”
Section: Musclementioning
confidence: 99%