2011
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microarrays, deep sequencing and the true measure of the transcriptome

Abstract: Microarrays first made the analysis of the transcriptome possible, and have produced much important information. Today, however, researchers are increasingly turning to direct high-throughput sequencing - RNA-Seq - which has considerable advantages for examining transcriptome fine structure - for example in the detection of allele-specific expression and splice junctions. In this article, we discuss the relative merits of the two techniques, the inherent biases in each, and whether all of the vast body of arra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
353
1
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(373 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
353
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although high-throughput RNA sequencing has recently become popular as an alternative to microarray analysis, the microarray platform, with its robust sample process and data analysis pipelines, is still the preferred choice for transcriptomic profiling involving a large number of samples in model plants with well-annotated genomes [14,15]. Many microarray-based studies have been carried out to identify abiotic stress responsive genes in specific rice varieties and transgenic rice [9,10,16,17], and comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting rice genotypes under salinity and drought stress have revealed novel genetic regulatory mechanisms involved in stress tolerance [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high-throughput RNA sequencing has recently become popular as an alternative to microarray analysis, the microarray platform, with its robust sample process and data analysis pipelines, is still the preferred choice for transcriptomic profiling involving a large number of samples in model plants with well-annotated genomes [14,15]. Many microarray-based studies have been carried out to identify abiotic stress responsive genes in specific rice varieties and transgenic rice [9,10,16,17], and comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting rice genotypes under salinity and drought stress have revealed novel genetic regulatory mechanisms involved in stress tolerance [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common analysis is differential expression, which is defined by molecular features that experience large changes in expression or abundance between groups (Malone and Oliver, 2011;Oshlack et al, 2010). In addition to differential variance (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information generated by RNA-seq and microarrays is thus complementary, highly congruent and in most cases allows for an integrative analysis of cellular pathways. A high correlation for mRNA abundance (0.7-0.9) between microarray-and RNA-seq-based gene expression analyses has been demonstrated (Malone and Oliver 2011;Marioni et al 2008), and matches differentially expressed genes ranges between 62 and 81 % (Brunskill et al 2011;Malone and Oliver 2011;Marioni et al 2008). Small discrepancies usually have been associated with sequencing depth and the number of reads to satisfactorily cover the genome in RNA-seq, and therefore a higher correlation between microarray and RNA-seq data is found at higher sequencing depth (genes mapped by more than 32 reads) (Marioni et al 2008).…”
Section: Rna-seq and Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a consequence, arrays may have an advantage in measuring differential gene expression for low-abundance transcripts when RNA-seq is not deep enough (Bloom et al 2009). Moreover, due to their intrinsic methodological properties, microarrays and RNA-seq approaches usually identify different sets of differentially expressed genes (Bradford et al 2010;Brunskill et al 2011;Malone and Oliver 2011;Marioni et al 2008), which suggests that a combination of RNA-seq and custom microarrays represents a powerful strategy to uncover wider transcriptome responses.…”
Section: Rna-seq and Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%