2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-008-0070-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbeam analysis applied to adhesion, surfaces and interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early approaches in the literature employ mechanical methods such as ball cratering to expose the metal substrate but suffer from limitations that involve smearing of soft polymeric materials. A more successful approach, introduced by Watts at the University of Surrey, implies taper sectioning of samples by ultralow angle microtomy (ULAM) . ULAM makes use of a tungsten carbide microtome (an instrument frequently used in histology laboratories to cut extremely thin slices of materials) to expose the metal oxide–polymer interface. , Unfortunately, this method is limited to the use of thin (<100 μm) metal foils as the substrate material and is therefore not applicable to industrial samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early approaches in the literature employ mechanical methods such as ball cratering to expose the metal substrate but suffer from limitations that involve smearing of soft polymeric materials. A more successful approach, introduced by Watts at the University of Surrey, implies taper sectioning of samples by ultralow angle microtomy (ULAM) . ULAM makes use of a tungsten carbide microtome (an instrument frequently used in histology laboratories to cut extremely thin slices of materials) to expose the metal oxide–polymer interface. , Unfortunately, this method is limited to the use of thin (<100 μm) metal foils as the substrate material and is therefore not applicable to industrial samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%