2017
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial agents in macroscopically healthy mammary gland tissues of small ruminants

Abstract: BackgroundHealth of mammary glands is fundamental for milk and dairy products hygiene and quality, with huge impacts on consumers welfare.MethodsThis study aims to investigate the microbial agents (bacteria, fungi and lentiviruses) isolated from 89 macroscopically healthy udders of regularly slaughtered small ruminants (41 sheep, 48 goats), also correlating their presence with the histological findings. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to evaluate the association between lesions and positivity for d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This ratio is similar to that reported in USA in which the NAS prevalence in goat mastitis ranged between 63.5 and 75% as reported by Tomita et al [33] and Gaucher, etc., respectively. However, in opposite to the situation in USA and our findings, NAS could be isolated from up to 95.9% of mastitic goat cases and even from 46.4% of healthy udder tissues in Italy [8,16] .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ratio is similar to that reported in USA in which the NAS prevalence in goat mastitis ranged between 63.5 and 75% as reported by Tomita et al [33] and Gaucher, etc., respectively. However, in opposite to the situation in USA and our findings, NAS could be isolated from up to 95.9% of mastitic goat cases and even from 46.4% of healthy udder tissues in Italy [8,16] .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Five isolates reacted negatively with the PCR and therefore were excluded from both tables (Table 3 and 4). These five isolated showed the antibiotic resistance profile R10 (n = 4) and R13 (n = 1) and were addressed to be Micrococci years, NAS replaced coagulase positive Staphylococci as a major mastitis pathogen in goats in many countries worldwide [16,30] . This may be attributed to many factors such as the vaccinal stress due to the use of anti S. aureus mastitis vaccines which could restrict the ability of the S. aureus strains to multiply and spread [31,32] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The health and functionality of the mammary gland are important factors in the welfare of dairy animals and milk production, as well as in dairy product quality and profitability for farmers and the dairy industry. Mastitis is typically caused by bacterial, fungal, or algal infections, and usually manifests as an increase of milk somatic cell count (SCC) [1]; however, pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, have been detected in about 20% of goat milk samples with SCC < 1 × 10 6 /mL [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an inflammatory disease of the mammary gland, which is manifested by an increased number of somatic cells in milk (18). Inflammation of the mammary gland is caused mainly by bacteria -the most prevalent are coagulase-negative staphylococci (22,24). Mastitis has economic implications related to the costs of treatment, premature slaughter (17), reduced growth of lambs and their mortality caused by reduced milk production, and a reduction in the price of milk due to its lower quality (24).…”
Section: Praca Oryginalnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inflammation of the mammary gland is caused mainly by bacteria -the most prevalent are coagulase-negative staphylococci (22,24). Mastitis has economic implications related to the costs of treatment, premature slaughter (17), reduced growth of lambs and their mortality caused by reduced milk production, and a reduction in the price of milk due to its lower quality (24). Subclinical mastitis negatively influences milk yield, and the low milk yield (especially with a reduced lactose concentration) is associated with a low cheese yield and cheese quality (22).…”
Section: Praca Oryginalnamentioning
confidence: 99%