2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10015-020-00645-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial associates and social behavior in ants

Abstract: Current research in life sciences provides advances on how animal-associated microbes affect behavior and its underlying neurophysiology. However, studies in this field are often limited to individuals outside of their social context, and neglect social dynamics. Contrarily, animals and humans develop and live in complex societies where they constantly adjust physiology and behavior to social interactions. To improve our understanding of how microbes and hosts interact and produce phenotypes at social and grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a broader view, with empirical access to the flows of nutrients in a colony, one may study the properties and functions of ant food‐sharing networks while varying different ecologically relevant parameters, such as food source availability or quality, predation risk and competition. Furthermore, tracking different materials in the trophallactic fluid is expected to be useful in other contemporary research subjects, including: the trade‐offs between food and pathogen transmission through contact networks (Csata & Dussutour, 2019; Sendova‐Franks et al., 2010; Stroeymeyt et al., 2018), the different nutritional needs within colonies and their close symbionts (Crumière et al., 2020), the control of microbial communities ingested with food (Sclocco & Teseo, 2020) and regulatory effects of trophallactic fluid on differential larval development (LeBoeuf et al, 2016, 2018). Importantly, this method can potentially be applicable to other trophallaxis‐performing insects, including various species of ants (Czaczkes et al., 2019), bees (Fard et al., 2020), wasps (Suryanarayanan & Jeanne, 2008; Taylor & Jeanne, 2018) and termites (Poissonnier et al., 2018, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a broader view, with empirical access to the flows of nutrients in a colony, one may study the properties and functions of ant food‐sharing networks while varying different ecologically relevant parameters, such as food source availability or quality, predation risk and competition. Furthermore, tracking different materials in the trophallactic fluid is expected to be useful in other contemporary research subjects, including: the trade‐offs between food and pathogen transmission through contact networks (Csata & Dussutour, 2019; Sendova‐Franks et al., 2010; Stroeymeyt et al., 2018), the different nutritional needs within colonies and their close symbionts (Crumière et al., 2020), the control of microbial communities ingested with food (Sclocco & Teseo, 2020) and regulatory effects of trophallactic fluid on differential larval development (LeBoeuf et al, 2016, 2018). Importantly, this method can potentially be applicable to other trophallaxis‐performing insects, including various species of ants (Czaczkes et al., 2019), bees (Fard et al., 2020), wasps (Suryanarayanan & Jeanne, 2008; Taylor & Jeanne, 2018) and termites (Poissonnier et al., 2018, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task-specific division of labor can also affect the microbiome of individuals, either because they differ in their exposure to microorganisms or because exchange of microorganisms occurs predominately between individuals carrying out the same task (Münger et al, 2018;Sinotte et al, 2020). In eusocial insects these differences are assumed to also increase the efficiency with which certain tasks are carried out and increase the extraction of nutrient that also fuel immune responses (Iorizzo et al, 2020;Sclocco and Teseo, 2020). Although the number of studies investigating the effects of the division of labor on the microbiome remains limited, the available information suggests distinct microbiomes for breeders and non-breeders as well as different worker castes in eusocial insects (Sclocco and Teseo, 2020;Sinotte et al, 2020).…”
Section: Organizational Immunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the technology underlying insect video tracking advances rapidly and significantly, many recently developed systems rely on offline data processing [11,[17][18][19][20][21]. This means that researchers often perform tracking on previously recorded videos and analyse data a posteriori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allows correcting errors and employing sophisticated and costly computational strategies, or even processing earlier datasets using future knowledge. On the other hand, offline data processing does not allow for simultaneous insights into already running experiments [ 22 ]. Graphics processing units (GPUs), which allow accelerating computation, begin to address this gap via integrating real-time data analysis [ 23 , 24 ] in the traditional way of conducting tracking-based studies on insect behaviour [ 12 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%