The de novo construction of a living organism is a compelling vision. Despite the astonishing technologies developed to modify living cells, building a functioning cell "from scratch" has yet to be accomplished. The pursuit of this goal alone has�and will�yield scientific insights affecting fields as diverse as cell biology, biotechnology, medicine, and astrobiology. Multiple approaches have aimed to create biochemical systems manifesting common characteristics of life, such as compartmentalization, metabolism, and replication and the derived features, evolution, responsiveness to stimuli, and directed movement. Significant achievements in synthesizing each of these criteria have been made, individually and in limited combinations. Here, we review these efforts, distinguish different approaches, and highlight bottlenecks in the current research. We look ahead at what work remains to be accomplished and propose a "roadmap" with key milestones to achieve the vision of building cells from molecular parts.
■ INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS A CELL AND WHY
BUILD ONE?What Is a Cell? Cells are discrete, compartmentalized units of living systems that are distinct from their surrounding environment and other cells. As individuals, they can interact with each other, the environment, and act as distinct units of selection in evolution. While most living cells comprise lipidbounded compartments, other biological entities, such as complex viruses, rely on protein capsules. Growing evidence suggests that compartmentalization via liquid−liquid phase separation (i.e., coacervate formation) may also be sufficient for compartmentalization. 1 The flexibility of this definition of a cell begs the question, "What is life?" While this has been debated for decades, if not centuries, even a modern, more complete understanding of biological systems at the molecular level has not yielded a consensus definition. 2 This is for good reason. Earth's organisms (the only ones known so far) demonstrate breathtaking diversity in their ecology, phenotypes, and biochemistry. Definitions of life have tended to search for commonality in life, and thus are repeatedly rewritten, following discoveries that disprove previously established rules. 3,4 Perhaps a generalized universal definition of life is even impossible: a "natural kind" in philosophy is a category that reflects the actual world and not just human interests or properties of a group. 5 For example, water is a natural kind, whereas chairs are not. Life is possibly not a natural kind, and thus there may never be a natural definition. 6 To anchor our discussion, we use Gańti's Chemoton model of life, 7 which uses three criteria: replication, metabolism, and compartmentalization. From these criteria emerge additional