Microbial colonization and resistome dynamics in food processing environments of a newly opened pork cutting industry during 1.5 years of activity

Abstract

Background The microorganisms that inhabit food processing environments (FPE) can strongly influence the associated food quality and safety. In particular, the possibility that FPE may act as a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, and a hotspot for the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) is a concern in meat processing plants. Here, we monitor microbial succession and resistome dynamics relating to FPE through a detailed analysis of a newly opened pork cutting plant over 1.5 years of activity. Results We identified a relatively restricted principal microbiota dominated by Pseudomonas during the first 2 months, while a higher taxonomic diversity, an increased representation of other taxa (e.g., Acinetobacter, Psychrobacter), and a certain degree of microbiome specialization on different surfaces was recorded later on. An increase in total abundance, alpha diversity, and β-dispersion of ARGs, which were predominantly assigned to Acinetobacter and associated with resistance to certain antimicrobials frequently used on pig farms of the region, was detected over time. Moreover, a sharp increase in the occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcaceae was observed when cutting activities started. ARGs associated with resistance to β-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and sulphonamides frequently co-occurred, and mobile genetic elements (i.e., plasmids, integrons) and lateral gene transfer events were mainly detected at the later sampling times in drains. Conclusions The observations made suggest that pig carcasses were a source of resistant bacteria that then colonized FPE and that drains, together with some food-contact surfaces, such as equipment and table surfaces, represented a reservoir for the spread of ARGs in the meat processing facility.

Microbiome Research as an Effective Driver of Success Stories in Agrifood Systems – A Selection of Case Studies

“… Bokulich and Mills (2013) described that the development of a microbial community within a food production environment is driven by community-wide adaptations in response to substrates or conditions within each environmental niche. The recent application of HTS techniques has expanded our knowledge of microbial communities in foods and their processing environment with an unprecedented level of detail ( Doyle et al, 2017 ; McHugh et al, 2020 ; Cobo-Díaz et al, 2021 ).…”

“…The meat microbiome has an important role in the conversion of the components of meat into several metabolites, with a consequential major impact on physical and organoleptic properties, and the quality and safety of the final products ( Cobo-Díaz et al, 2021 ; Franciosa et al, 2021 ). The initial microbiota is influenced by several factors such as the season, slaughter procedure, transport conditions, manufacturing equipment, factory environment and operators ( Franciosa et al, 2021 ).…”

Bactericidal Efficacy of Nanostructured Surfaces Increases under Flow Conditions

“…The impact of bacterial colonization goes beyond the health sector. Losses in the food industry due to bacterial colonization and related issues amount to millions of dollars per year. , The marine industry also suffers losses amounting to billions of dollars due to bacterial colonization and biofilm formation . Microbial induced corrosion also causes industries multibillion dollar annual losses .…”

Application of Quasimetagenomics Methods to Define Microbial Diversity and SubtypeListeria monocytogenesin Dairy and Seafood Production Facilities

“…Food safety and quality are impacted by the microbial ecology within manufacturing facilities. Industrial surfaces (e.g., utensils, architecture, equipment) within food manufacturing facilities are known sources of microbial food contamination, acting as both vehicles for transmission to food commodities and environmental reservoirs for persistence (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”

“…Additionally, raw materials, food ingredients and processing water are known to contribute to the microbiome of the finished product and may also introduce lot to lot variations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”