2020
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial colonization of metal sulfide minerals at a diffuse‐flow deep‐sea hydrothermal vent at 9°50′N on the East Pacific Rise

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clones in the library of the primary culture were affiliated with the following taxonomic groups ( Figure 2 ): the active bacterial community was mainly composed of Gammaproteobacteria (92.66–98.95%), Alphaproteobacteria (0.004–5.27%), Campylobacteria (0–0.8%), Actinobacteria (0–0.39%), Bacteroidia (0–2.04%), and unclassified proteobacteria . Many of the phylotypes in the primary cultures are similar to the in situ enrichment clones recovered from the sulfide mineral of the active vents ( Wang C. H. et al, 2020 ) and the uncultured environmental clones retrieved from the plumes of the active vents ( Sylvan et al, 2012a ). Simultaneously, these phylotypes were also detected in secondary enrichment cultures at the end of 1 month of long-term incubation ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The clones in the library of the primary culture were affiliated with the following taxonomic groups ( Figure 2 ): the active bacterial community was mainly composed of Gammaproteobacteria (92.66–98.95%), Alphaproteobacteria (0.004–5.27%), Campylobacteria (0–0.8%), Actinobacteria (0–0.39%), Bacteroidia (0–2.04%), and unclassified proteobacteria . Many of the phylotypes in the primary cultures are similar to the in situ enrichment clones recovered from the sulfide mineral of the active vents ( Wang C. H. et al, 2020 ) and the uncultured environmental clones retrieved from the plumes of the active vents ( Sylvan et al, 2012a ). Simultaneously, these phylotypes were also detected in secondary enrichment cultures at the end of 1 month of long-term incubation ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Some minerals containing variable-valence elements can also affect microbial communities by generating energy through terminal electron acceptor or donor redox [ 26 ], especially iron-binding or sulfur-binding minerals [ 27 , 28 ]. Wang et al interpreted the bioavailability of metal sulfide minerals (mercury sulfides, pyrite, and marcasite) as electron donors that may be the key control on deep-sea chemosynthetic community activity and proliferation [ 29 ]. In addition, the influence of minerals on the community assemblage processes was also controlled by external factors (conditions of the bulk environments), such as land-use intensities [ 22 ], hot springs sedimentary composition [ 15 ], and forest plant cover [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extreme environment, minerals act as a particular interface and additional selective pressure on microbes, due to their special physical properties and nutrient content [ 14 , 15 ]. Such microbes’ selective colonization of different minerals has been observed in a subglacial environment and a submarine hydrothermal system [ 29 , 33 ]. However, relatively few mineral colonization studies have been done in hot springs [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%