2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial community utilization of added carbon substrates in response to long-term carbon input manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
172
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
172
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Aneja et al, 2006;Frossard et al, 2013). A characteristic shift in microbial community structure is related to additions of root exudates that increase the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria, while decreasing the proportion of Gram-positive bacteria (Griffiths et al, 1998;Lu et al, 2007;McMahon et al, 2005;Brant et al, 2006;Williams et al, 2007). However, in our study we recovered considerably more pronounced effects from SOC (e.g.…”
Section: Key Role Of Soil Organic Carbon In Shaping Microbial Communitycontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Aneja et al, 2006;Frossard et al, 2013). A characteristic shift in microbial community structure is related to additions of root exudates that increase the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria, while decreasing the proportion of Gram-positive bacteria (Griffiths et al, 1998;Lu et al, 2007;McMahon et al, 2005;Brant et al, 2006;Williams et al, 2007). However, in our study we recovered considerably more pronounced effects from SOC (e.g.…”
Section: Key Role Of Soil Organic Carbon In Shaping Microbial Communitycontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Moreover, while the rhizosphere had no statistically significant effect on total litter recovery, we recovered a greater fraction of the applied litter in the root fraction of planted compared to unplanted plots, which counter-intuitively indicates greater comminution of roots into bulk soil in the absence of the plant rhizosphere. This observation may be tied to greater soil moisture levels in unplanted plots leading to higher soil activity of the fauna responsible for comminution, or to differences in the microbial or macrofaunal communities in the planted and unplanted plots (e.g., Brandt et al 2006;Bird et al 2011;Shi et al 2015). Populations of soil macrofauna, which are key to litter comminution, can be reduced during dry conditions (Lindberg et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the set of rules used to group compounds into classes of intrinsic decomposition rates may be different than the classification needed to characterize sorptive interactions with mineral surfaces. Other compound classifications of interest for SOM cycling would reflect the influence of the compound chemistry on carbonuse efficiency (Brant et al, 2006;Frey et al, 2013;Sinsabaugh et al, 2013), high-affinity interactions with soil minerals (Gordon and Millero, 1985;Gu et al, 1994;Kleber et al, 2005;Mikutta et al, 2007), susceptibility to exoenzyme decomposition (Allison et al, 2010;Schimel and Weintraub, 2003;Sinsabaugh and Shah, 2012), and process-dependent temperature sensitivity (Conant et al, 2011;Davidson and Janssens, 2006). The impacts of these mechanisms depend strongly on the environment in which they operate.…”
Section: Carbon Decomposition Reaction Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%