2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbial Degradation and Valorization of Plastic Wastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
260
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
(214 reference statements)
1
260
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical structures of both PS and PPS have an aromatic ring in common ( Figure 4 A). A greater number of enzyme-mediated reaction steps are required to open the aromatic ring to produce acetyl-Co A, or to succinate for the TCA cycle and PHA for energy production [ 41 ]. Thus, rather more complicated enzyme systems could be one of the reasons for their slowed biodegradation rates compared with PE ( Figure 4 B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical structures of both PS and PPS have an aromatic ring in common ( Figure 4 A). A greater number of enzyme-mediated reaction steps are required to open the aromatic ring to produce acetyl-Co A, or to succinate for the TCA cycle and PHA for energy production [ 41 ]. Thus, rather more complicated enzyme systems could be one of the reasons for their slowed biodegradation rates compared with PE ( Figure 4 B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we documented that antibiotic repression of gut microbiota will weaken their capability of degrading plastic [7]. This result suggested that their gut microbiota played an indispensable role in plastic degradation and may be a bioresource for the pursuit of plastic-degrading microbes [8]. Therefore, we made an effort to screen the plastic-degrading microbes from their gut microbiota.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive weight reduction implies that specific catabolic enzymes were synthesised by the isolates and attacked the untreated PP microplastic, leading to the polymer's partial degradation and subsequent reduction. As mentioned earlier, these isolates may also possess a particular signalling and catabolic pathway that promotes the cell adherence to the polymers and their subsequent absorption/desorption and degradation [37]. Lack of degradation in the control flask was indicated by the constant weight of PP microplastics throughout the experiment.…”
Section: Growth Of Bacteria On Pp-supplemented Medium and Estimation mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Yet, the small growth of ADL15 could degrade a higher percentage of PP microplastic (Mdn = 17, n = 3) than ADL36 (Mdn = 7, n = 3) (U = 0.000, p = 0.043, r = 0.825), as shown in Figure 1c. The growth of these bacterial isolates might differ due to their distinctive metabolic rates, genetic plasticity, polymer preferences, and mode of substrate colonisation [37]. The higher tolerance of ADL15 towards the exposure of PP could lie within the genus itself.…”
Section: Growth Of Bacteria On Pp-supplemented Medium and Estimation mentioning
confidence: 99%